UK Government Considering Tobacco Tax Increase, Raising Cost of a Pack to £16

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Mar.01.2024
UK Government Considering Tobacco Tax Increase, Raising Cost of a Pack to £16
UK government considering tobacco tax increase in upcoming budget, potentially raising cost of a pack to £16, sparking controversy.

  According to The Sun report, the UK government may increase tobacco taxes in next week's budget, meaning smokers could potentially see the price of a 20-pack of cigarettes rise to £16.

 

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt is planning to increase taxes next week. In recent years, the UK government has been striving to make the country smoke-free, leading to a sharp rise in tobacco prices. Currently, the average price for a pack of 20 cigarettes is around £14.39, while in Germany, the same pack averages only £6.50. However, the cost of nicotine is expected to reach a new high in less than a week. The news of the price increase has caused a stir on social media, with many expressing their concerns on various platforms.

 

A Facebook user wrote: "Okay, I'm going to quit smoking." Another user reminisced about the past, writing: "I remember when a pack of 10 cigarettes used to cost only £2.15, times have really changed."

 

The measures are expected to provide the government with approximately £500 million in budget. Many people, both smokers and non-smokers, are angry about the upcoming tobacco price hike. One internet user wrote, "I never smoke, but I can see that the price of a pack of cigarettes could rise to £16. For those who smoke, this is a huge burden."

 

In addition, industry experts warn that this measure could have unintended consequences. Sarah Connor, from Japan Tobacco International's UK division, stated: 

 

"Unreasonable tobacco taxes fuel illegal sales of tobacco, waste taxpayers' money, and inflate prices."

 

Life economist Christopher Snowden added, "The government's position on e-cigarettes has become a mess. They claim to want to crackdown on disposable e-cigarettes, but are actually taxing reusable e-liquids. While the government offers free e-cigarettes through the 'Swap to Stop' program, they are making it unaffordable for those willing to pay."

 

He pointed out, "The government claims it wants to reduce the tax burden, but appears to be eager to tax smoking."

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Virginia Tightens Vape and Tobacco Retail Enforcement, With Fines Up to $15,000 Per Unlisted Product
Virginia Tightens Vape and Tobacco Retail Enforcement, With Fines Up to $15,000 Per Unlisted Product
A new Virginia law that took effect on July 1, 2026, requires retailers to obtain permits to sell liquid nicotine, vape and tobacco products, while directing Virginia ABC to conduct inspections and verify that stores sell only products listed in the state directory.
Jul.20
Product | OLIVEBAR Launches RAZ PRO 85K, Combining Up to 85,000 Puffs With a Transparent Pod Design
Product | OLIVEBAR Launches RAZ PRO 85K, Combining Up to 85,000 Puffs With a Transparent Pod Design
OLIVEBAR has introduced the RAZ PRO 85K disposable vape, featuring up to 85,000 puffs, a transparent e-liquid pod, and a Mega HD display. As competition in the ultra-high-puff disposable segment continues to intensify, the new device reflects an industry shift from simply increasing puff counts toward enhancing visual interaction and user experience.
Jul.03
Product | VAPORESSO Launches PRIX MTL Pod, With NFC Version Linking Interchangeable Panels to On-Screen Animations
Product | VAPORESSO Launches PRIX MTL Pod, With NFC Version Linking Interchangeable Panels to On-Screen Animations
VAPORESSO introduced the PRIX MTL pod system in August 2026 in two versions, Filter and NFC. The Filter version allows users to switch between a conventional drip tip and a filter tip, while the NFC version links interchangeable panels to matching on-screen animations. PRIX features a 2,600mAh battery, a 5.5ml pod, a 0.87-inch TFT display and a maximum output of 40W, alongside Dual Mesh Impact Pods capable of operating at two resistance and power configurations. VAPORESSO's French website lists MSRP at $39.99 for the Filter version and $49.90 for the NFC version.
Market
Aug.24 by 2Firsts Perspectives
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the FDA’s denial of MH Global LLC’s applications to market flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The court ruled that FDA’s comparative-efficacy framework, which requires applicants to show that flavored products provide greater cessation or switching benefits than tobacco-flavored alternatives, is consistent with the Tobacco Control Act’s “appropriate for the protection of the public health” standard. The court also found that FDA was not required to establish the framework through notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Aug.26
Scottish Vape Display Rules Could Cost Businesses £61 Million, Affecting More Than 11,000 Retail Outlets
Scottish Vape Display Rules Could Cost Businesses £61 Million, Affecting More Than 11,000 Retail Outlets
A Scottish government impact assessment estimates that proposed vape display and packaging rules could create up to £61 million ($82 million) in compliance costs for businesses, affecting more than 11,000 retail outlets. The estimated costs are mainly linked to inventory adjustments, retail storage changes and the resources required for businesses to understand and implement the new requirements. The measures form part of the UK’s broader efforts to tighten vape regulation, particularly around product displays, packaging and sales practices.
Aug.10
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
The UK High Court has ordered Chinese vape manufacturer Shenzhen SKE Technology to provide £569,039 ($776,000) in security for costs in its design infringement proceedings against Vapepen London and other defendants over its Crystal Bar vape product. The court did not accept the defendants’ main argument that recovering costs from a China-based company would face significant enforcement obstacles, but found that SKE had not sufficiently disclosed its own financial position. The order is procedural and does not determine the underlying infringement claims.
News
Aug.21