England to ban single-use e-cigarettes from June 2025

Oct.24.2024
England to ban single-use e-cigarettes from June 2025
The UK government has announced that England will ban the sale of single-use e-cigarettes from 1 June 2025. On the 22nd of this month, the Welsh Government also issued a statement on its official website confirming a ban on the use of disposable e-cigarettes from June 2025. Currently, two of the four UK regions have issued official statements on the matter.

The UK government announced on its official website on 24th October that England will ban the sale of single-use e-cigarettes from 1 June 2025.

 

Minister for the Circular Economy Mary Creagh confirmed today (24 October) that a new bill has been introduced to Parliament to ban the sale of single-use e-cigarettes from 1 June 2025.

 

The UK government has introduced legislation to ban the sale of remaining stocks by businesses by 1 June 2025, subject to parliamentary approval. Businesses will need to prepare for the ban to take effect. The UK Cabinet Office and local authorities are working closely together to set a consistent date.

 

Between 2012 and 2023, the use of e-cigarettes in England is expected to increase by over 400%, with 9.1% of the UK population currently buying and using these products.

 

Minister for the Circular Economy Mary Creagh said: "Single-use e-cigarettes are extremely wasteful and have caused concern in our towns and cities."

 

"That's why we need to ban single-use e-cigarettes to end the culture of waste in this country," she said. "This is the first step towards a circular economy, where we will extend the use of resources, reduce waste, accelerate progress towards net zero emissions and create thousands of job opportunities across the country."

 

Minister for Public Health and Prevention Andrew Gwynne added: "It is worrying that a quarter of 11-15 year olds used e-cigarettes last year, with disposable e-cigarettes being the choice of most children. Banning disposable e-cigarettes will not only help protect the environment, it will also reduce the appeal of e-cigarettes to children and prevent vulnerable young people from being influenced. The Government will also implement the Tobacco and Electronic Cigarettes Act, the most important public health measure for generations, to protect young people from the effects of nicotine and pave the way for a smoke-free Britain."

 

Green Alliance's Head of Resources, Libby Peake, said: "single-use e-cigarettes are the last thing our children and the planet need, and the unchecked growth of the market for them has gone on for far too long. Each one is a waste of vital resources needed for more sustainable economic development, such as the lithium used in electric vehicle batteries. When littered, the nicotine, plastics and batteries they contain are extremely harmful. Even if thrown away, their batteries can catch fire. Government bans on these harmful devices are a welcome step towards reducing waste in the economy."

 

"The emergence of single-use e-cigarettes, possibly the first mainstream disposable electronic device, is polluting our streets and reflects the continued evolution of the tobacco industry. The UK government's plan to ban these disposable products by 2025 is a popular and important step. The ban not only aims to reduce the number of discarded e-cigarettes, but also challenges the wider trend of disposable technology, which is contributing to a worrying increase in electronic waste, accompanied by fire hazards and the use of scarce materials. From a health perspective, I also welcome this ban and believe it is essential in breaking the control of e-cigarettes over young people and challenging the throwaway culture that threatens to choke our planet," said climate campaigner and environmental scientist, Less Waste Laura.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
Philip Morris Malaysia Again Meets Religious Authority Over Cigarette Alternatives as Perlis Mufti Responds on Halal Criteria
Philip Morris Malaysia Again Meets Religious Authority Over Cigarette Alternatives as Perlis Mufti Responds on Halal Criteria
Philip Morris Malaysia Managing Director Naeem Shahab Khan met Perlis Mufti Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin on September 17 and presented the company's shift from conventional cigarettes toward alternative products. The mufti said a product could be considered halal if it is clean, its side effects are not harmful or can be controlled, and it does not involve excessive waste. His remarks did not mention IQOS or any other specific PMI product and did not amount to a new product-specific religious ruling. It was at least the second publicly reported engagement between Philip Morris Malaysia and a Malaysian religious institution over cigarette alternatives within six months.
Regulations
Sep.18 by 2Firsts Perspectives
FDA Authorizes JUUL2, Cites Adult Switching Amid Efforts to Speed PMTA Reviews
FDA Authorizes JUUL2, Cites Adult Switching Amid Efforts to Speed PMTA Reviews
The FDA authorized the JUUL2 device and tobacco- and menthol-flavored pods on Aug. 28, bringing the number of authorized e-cigarette products to 48. The agency highlighted complete switching among adult smokers, with six-week switching rates reaching 28.4%–49.3% for the menthol pod. The decision comes as FDA works to speed PMTA reviews, reduce application backlogs and expand authorized e-cigarette and nicotine-pouch products while maintaining enforcement priorities for unauthorized products.
Regulations
Aug.29
Australia Brings in Deloitte to Support Illicit Tobacco and Vape Enforcement Across Data, Processes and Project Delivery
Australia Brings in Deloitte to Support Illicit Tobacco and Vape Enforcement Across Data, Processes and Project Delivery
Australia’s Department of Home Affairs has hired Deloitte to provide data analytics, business-process, communications and project-delivery support to the Office of the Illicit Tobacco and E-Cigarette Commissioner. The government says Deloitte personnel do not provide policy advice to the Commissioner or the Australian government, with policy development and decision-making remaining with public officials. The arrangement has nevertheless drawn scrutiny because Deloitte has previously provided professional services to several tobacco and vaping companies.
Sep.03
Product | Philip Morris Korea Launches TEREA Limona Pearl, Expanding Fresh Blend Capsule Lineup to Five
Product | Philip Morris Korea Launches TEREA Limona Pearl, Expanding Fresh Blend Capsule Lineup to Five
Philip Morris Korea launched TEREA Limona Pearl in South Korea on August 31, 2026, expanding the TEREA Fresh Blend capsule tobacco stick lineup from four variants to five. Designed for the IQOS ILUMA series, the new stick combines a capsule with what the company calls a Fresh Filter. Philip Morris Korea describes the product as offering an aromatic, refreshing flavor profile with a cooling sensation, with an additional fresh note released when the capsule is crushed. The recommended retail price is KRW 4,800 per pack, with sales through IQOS stores and convenience stores nationwide. No reliable evidence has been found that the same Limona Pearl SKU was previously officially launched in another major IQOS market.
Sep.01
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14