UK Parliament Backbench Debate: Is WHO Really Doing Good for Human Health?

Special Report by Charlotte Yu
Jan.19.2024
UK Parliament Backbench Debate: Is WHO Really Doing Good for Human Health?
Without tax (price) incentives and flavor differentiation compared to traditional cigarettes, there would be little motivation for people to quit smoking.

A backbench debate was held on Jan 18 in the UK Parliament as the tenth session of the Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (COP10) is scheduled to take place in Panama from February 5 to 10, and the UK will be sending a delegation.

 

The debate, initiated by Members of Parliament Andrew Lewer, Mr. Virendra Sharma, and Martyn Day, aimed to challenge the WHO's opposition to e-cigarettes, focusing on the regulation of e-cigarettes in the UK, the World Health Organization (WHO), and the differing stances of the organization and the UK government on e-cigarettes.

 

The WHO for a long time has been committed to controlling the use of tobacco and nicotine products, particularly e-cigarettes. According to reports from December 14, 2023, the organization emphasized the need for urgent action to control e-cigarettes, aiming to protect children and non-smokers while minimizing health risks to the public. The WHO pointed out that the nicotine present in e-cigarettes is highly addictive and harmful to health.

 

During the debate on Thursday, Member of Parliament Andrew Lewer argued against this perspective. He cited research from Cancer Research UK, stating that "it's not nicotine but the chemicals produced during the combustion of tobacco that cause lung cancer."

 

Based on this theoretical finding, MP Andrew Lewer throughout the debate addressed vaporized e-cigarettes as "tobacco harm reduction products," aligning with the broader direction of the UK government's tobacco control policy. He insisted on two central arguments. First, new tobacco products, including vaporized e-cigarettes, should not be subject to the same tax rates as traditional cigarettes. Second, flavored vaporized e-cigarettes should not be banned. He argued that without tax (price) incentives and flavor differentiation compared to traditional cigarettes, there would be little motivation for people to quit smoking.

 

UK Parliament Backbench Debate: Is WHO Really Doing Good for Human Health?
Andrew Lewer, a member of parliament who spoke in the backbench debate on January 18th | Image source: 2FIRSTS

 

In addition to urging the UK delegation to maintain its stance on the smoking cessation role of e-cigarettes in international conferences, Andrew Lewer also questioned the entire WHO institution during the debate and raised the issue of whether the UK should review the scale of its donations to the organization. This is because the UK is currently one of the largest funders of the WHO, and there is a need to ensure that "taxpayers' money is well utilized."

 

Later in the debate, co-initiator Virendra Sharma stated, "COP10 and WHO should not make it harder for those who want to quit smoking with e-cigarettes." Therefore, policies that excessively regulate e-cigarettes, heated tobacco, and oral nicotine pouches are worthy of debate.

 

He also mentioned that although the UK is a global leader in tobacco harm reduction policies, it can still learn from other countries' successful experiences in using new nicotine products to control smoking. He cited Japan and Sweden as examples where heated tobacco and oral snus significantly reduced smoking rates. There are better ways for the UK to achieve a better outcome through compromise.

 

Labour politician and Member of Parliament for Bristol South, Karin Marguerite Smyth, also participated in the debate. After expressing anticipation for the UK delegation's participation in the treaty conference and conveying the country's voice, she mentioned that many MPs have received letters from constituents inquiring about e-cigarettes and smoking because it will be a central topic at COP10. Voters are concerned about whether this conference will change the future use of e-cigarettes by British citizens. She asked the Minister of Public Health if there are plans to include other nicotine products in the upcoming government bill's regulatory process.

 

UK Parliament Backbench Debate: Is WHO Really Doing Good for Human Health?
Virendra Sharma | Image source: 2FIRSTS

 

The responsibility of responding to inquiries in this debate fell on Dame Andrea Jacqueline Leadsom, who has taken office as the Deputy Minister of Public Health, Start for Life, and Primary Care since November 2023. She expressed opposing views to some points raised by the aforementioned MPs.

 

Using her own experience of teenage smoking and the challenging process of quitting, she stated that claiming nicotine is entirely harmless is "wrong" and reiterated the addictive nature of nicotine. She also raised some questions, mentioning that flavors like cherryade and bubble-gum are not designed for adults. These flavors and packaging resembling little Coke bottles or brightly colored like bubble-gum are clearly "aimed at children." The fact that e-cigarettes are placed next to candies, sold conveniently at pocket-money prices is concerning. Therefore, she urged MPs not to "naively look at this issue" and emphasized that only strong enforcement measures can ensure that e-cigarettes are not sold to minors.

 

UK Parliament Backbench Debate: Is WHO Really Doing Good for Human Health?
Dame Andrea Jacqueline Leadsom who spoke in the back seat debate on January 18th | Image source: 2FIRSTS

 

Regarding the upcoming COP10, she described the UK as a "unique case" on the issue of e-cigarettes and stated that the country will present its position at the conference, emphasizing that e-cigarettes are a crucial tool to help adults quit smoking. "But as for whether there should be a change in the current level of donations to the WHO, the UK government tends to maintain the existing level." She concluded by stating that she will provide a statement to the Parliament after COP10 to update on the proceedings.

 

E-cigarettes in Backbench Debates

 

This is not the first time tobacco (or novel tobacco) has appeared in backbench debates in the UK.

 

Backbench debates, also known as Westminster Hall debates, allow MPs to raise local or national issues and receive responses from government ministers.

 

According to incomplete statistics, in June 2020, government MPs revolted against the ban on people importing liquid nicotine for e-cigarettes; on November 3, 2022, the House of Commons debated the Independent Review of Smokefree 2030 policies; and earlier this week, there was another debate on e-cigarettes. On January 16, a debate hosted by Conservative MP Peter Gibson discussed issues related to illicit (gray) market vaping products and underage illegal vaping.

 

The UK's stance on novel tobacco, especially e-cigarettes, has consistently differed from the WHO's perspective. The UK government has been supportive of e-cigarettes as an alternative to reduce the harm of smoking. According to the UK government's viewpoint, e-cigarettes can help smokers quit, and their harm is much lower than that of traditional tobacco products.

 

A report from Policy Exchange indicates that smoking has a significant impact on the economy, and reducing smoking rates not only improves health conditions and alleviates the burden on the national health service but also promotes productivity and economic growth.

 

2FIRSTS will continue to monitor the upcoming Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (COP10) in Panama, as well as developments in UK tobacco control policies and regulations for both traditional and novel tobacco products.

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

 $20 Million, a Permanent Injunction and Distributor Controls: Posh Deal Tightens Illinois Vape Compliance
$20 Million, a Permanent Injunction and Distributor Controls: Posh Deal Tightens Illinois Vape Compliance
An Illinois court ordered three companies tied to Posh vapes to pay $20 million and permanently restricted the sale, marketing and distribution in Illinois of products lacking required FDA authorization. The consent order also imposes downstream distributor controls, age-verification measures and social-media marketing limits, creating a new state-level compliance benchmark for disposable vape businesses.
Regulations
Aug.05
U.S. Appeals Court Says BAT Must Face Class Action Over Cigarette Labels
U.S. Appeals Court Says BAT Must Face Class Action Over Cigarette Labels
A U.S. appeals court ruled that British American Tobacco (BAT) must continue facing a consumer class action lawsuit over cigarette labels. The ruling allows the case to proceed but does not determine that BAT violated the law or is liable for damages. The case highlights ongoing legal risks facing major tobacco companies related to product labeling, consumer disclosures and product liability claims.
Jul.31
From Border-Logistics Insiders to Retail Service Stations, Australia Mounts a Sweeping Crackdown on the Illicit Nicotine Trade as iGET Vapes Surface in A$80 Million Crime Networks
From Border-Logistics Insiders to Retail Service Stations, Australia Mounts a Sweeping Crackdown on the Illicit Nicotine Trade as iGET Vapes Surface in A$80 Million Crime Networks
Australian authorities have disclosed two major enforcement actions that go beyond product seizures and retail closures to examine how illicit tobacco and vape networks operate. On Aug. 14, the Multi Agency Strike Team said seven people had been charged and two criminal networks were valued by authorities at a combined A$80 million, or about US$56.8 million. Investigators allege the groups used bonded warehouses, freight businesses and “trusted insiders” in legitimate industries to circumvent border controls. In a separate operation on Aug. 11, more than 100 service stations were targeted as authorities sought information on illicit tobacco importation, distribution networks and the movement of sales proceeds.
Aug.17
Australia’s Tobacco Tax Debate Intensifies as One Nation’s Barnaby Joyce Warns of Illicit Market Growth
Australia’s Tobacco Tax Debate Intensifies as One Nation’s Barnaby Joyce Warns of Illicit Market Growth
Australian One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce has criticised continued tobacco excise increases, arguing that higher taxes are driving consumers toward illicit tobacco markets and benefiting organised crime groups.
Regulations
Jul.13 by 2Firsts Perspectives
UK HMRC Plans 30,000 Retail Enforcement Actions as Illegal Tobacco and Vape Sellers Face Tougher Crackdown
UK HMRC Plans 30,000 Retail Enforcement Actions as Illegal Tobacco and Vape Sellers Face Tougher Crackdown
The UK government has announced that HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) will carry out more than 30,000 interventions targeting businesses and retail premises during the 2026-2027 financial year. The actions will focus on tax fraud, illegal goods sales and businesses involved in unlawful activities through retail channels. The government said illegal tobacco and illegal vape sales remain areas of concern. The move shows that UK enforcement against illegal nicotine products is expanding from import and supply channels toward retail-level oversight, alongside the upcoming introduction of the Vaping Products Duty.
Jul.24
JT Plans ¥800 Billion Investment in Heated Tobacco Over Three Years, Betting on Ploom as Second Growth Engine
JT Plans ¥800 Billion Investment in Heated Tobacco Over Three Years, Betting on Ploom as Second Growth Engine
Japan Tobacco Inc. (JT) CEO Takehiko Tsutsui said the company plans to invest about ¥800 billion (approximately US$5.4 billion) in heated tobacco products over three years through 2028, aiming to establish Ploom as a second growth engine after combustible cigarettes. Tsutsui said Ploom AURA helped JT increase its share of Japan’s heated tobacco market to 15.8% in the first quarter of 2026. Ploom products are now available in 29 markets, with Ploom AURA sold in 25 markets including Japan. JT also plans to continue its cigarette business while positioning its food operations, particularly frozen noodle products in North America, as another growth opportunity.
Jul.23