Vietnam Considers Proposal to Ban Sales of Heated Tobacco and E-cigarettes

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dec.01.2023
Vietnam Considers Proposal to Ban Sales of Heated Tobacco and E-cigarettes
Vietnam's Ministry of Health has proposed a ban on the sale of heated tobacco and e-cigarettes, citing health concerns.

According to a report from Baomoi on November 30, the Vietnamese Ministry of Health has stated that the Ministry of Industry and Trade may submit a proposal to the government to ban the sale of heated tobacco and e-cigarettes. However, the Ministry of Industry and Trade has expressed its intention to include new generation tobacco products as adjustments to the government's Decree No. 67/2013/NĐ-CP, in order to facilitate appropriate management in line with actual requirements. It is expected that this adjustment will be submitted to the Prime Minister in the fourth quarter of 2023.

 

According to a survey conducted by the Ministry of Health in Vietnam in 2020, the usage rate of e-cigarettes has increased by 18 times across 34 provinces and cities. The General Department of Market Management has reported that the number of smuggled e-cigarettes is approximately nine times higher than that of heated tobacco products.

 

In addition, the national market regulatory agencies have dealt with multiple cases of e-cigarette smuggling in the first half of 2023, vigorously investigating and handling a total of 728 cases, with 589 instances of illegal activities being addressed. The total amount of fines imposed for these administrative violations nearly reaches 3.1 billion Vietnamese Dong.

 

According to a survey conducted by Labor Daily in October 2022, 50% of respondents reported having knowledge of or prior exposure to heated tobacco products, while 97% were aware of or had experience with e-cigarettes.

 

Experts have suggested that whether it is the establishment of long-term management policies or limited-term pilot programs, both tobacco products and nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and heated tobacco must be regulated in accordance with the definition of tobacco products stipulated in the Tobacco Control Law of 2012. This simultaneous management is necessary to thoroughly address the current inadequacies in the regulation of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco, and both products do not fall under the list of prohibited commodities under the Investment Law.

 

Experts suggest that to find a solution to cover the entire market of the new generation tobacco industry, the most appropriate approach would be to simultaneously pilot or regulate heat-not-burn tobacco and closed system e-cigarettes under a unified legal framework, in order to address the current shortcomings comprehensively.

 

Additionally, it is necessary to enact quality standards for e-cigarettes and heated tobacco, as well as regulations on product laws, commercial production, import and export regulations, distribution regulations, tax policies, product labeling, advertising, and promotional regulations... This will establish legal channels for the management and supervision of these projects.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

South Korea’s New Vape Rules Raise Bar for E-Liquid Makers and China-Linked Supply Chains, Expert Says
South Korea’s New Vape Rules Raise Bar for E-Liquid Makers and China-Linked Supply Chains, Expert Says
South Korea’s new vape regulations are reshaping the e-liquid market, raising compliance requirements for manufacturers, retailers and overseas suppliers. In an interview with 2Firsts, Korean nicotine products specialist Sam Kim discusses licensing barriers, inventory impacts, China-linked supply chains, and emerging regulatory challenges around nicotine analogues, nicotine-free products and DIY mixing. The Korean case may offer broader insights as governments worldwide adapt to rapidly evolving nicotine products.
Jul.16
FTC Scrutinizes Fifty Bar’s “Made in America” Claims as Vape Marketing Faces New Compliance Risk
FTC Scrutinizes Fifty Bar’s “Made in America” Claims as Vape Marketing Faces New Compliance Risk
The Federal Trade Commission sent a warning letter to Lucky Bar Holdings LLC over “Made in the USA” claims tied to Fifty Bar vape products, saying staff had reason to believe the products may be imported in whole or in significant part despite unqualified U.S.-origin marketing claims.
Jul.20
Bringing Tax and Insurance Into Nicotine Regulation: Insights From a Tobacco Harm-Reduction Report
Bringing Tax and Insurance Into Nicotine Regulation: Insights From a Tobacco Harm-Reduction Report
A smoke-free nicotine policy report argues that tobacco harm reduction should move beyond product bans and health warnings into tax policy, insurance pricing and risk-based regulation. While some projections remain open to debate, the report highlights a wider challenge: nicotine products, technologies and consumer behavior have changed sharply over the past decade, and regulatory systems may need new tools to better align tobacco control with harm-reduction goals.
Jun.08
NielsenIQ and Goldman Sachs Data Show Smokeless Was the Only Growing Major U.S. Nicotine Category
NielsenIQ and Goldman Sachs Data Show Smokeless Was the Only Growing Major U.S. Nicotine Category
NielsenIQ and Goldman Sachs data show U.S. smokeless nicotine product sales rose more than 8% year over year in the 52 weeks ended May 30, making it the only major nicotine category to record growth.
Market
Jun.23
Australian State Targets Illegal Tobacco Retailers With Tougher Closure Powers
Australian State Targets Illegal Tobacco Retailers With Tougher Closure Powers
According to Reuters, Australia’s state of Victoria introduced legislation to give police and the state tobacco licensing regulator stronger powers to shut businesses selling illegal tobacco, with non-compliant operators facing fines of more than A$2.4 million and up to 20 years in prison.
Jun.05
EU Tobacco Rules Face Pushback as Analysis Says 90% of Consultation Responses Raised Objections
EU Tobacco Rules Face Pushback as Analysis Says 90% of Consultation Responses Raised Objections
An analysis by We Are Innovation says more than 90% of over 82,000 responses to the European Commission’s public consultation on the Tobacco Products Directive revision raised at least one substantial objection to the proposed regulatory direction.
Jul.13