Brazil Federal Tax Authority Cracks Down on E-cigarette Sales

Dec.17.2024
Brazil Federal Tax Authority Cracks Down on E-cigarette Sales
Brazilian Federal Revenue Agency strengthens e-cigarette sales regulation, suspending operations of 22 companies in São Paulo for non-compliance.

According to a report by G1.Globo on December 16th, the Brazilian Federal Revenue Agency has intensified its monitoring of e-cigarette sales. Since October, 22 businesses in São Paulo have had their tax identification numbers (CNPJ) suspended. Authorities have stated that they plan to take broader actions against unregistered small vendors by 2025, including confiscating goods and possible criminal prosecution.


In 2024, the seizure volume of e-cigarettes reached a new high of 240 million Real (39 million USD), nearly quadrupling from 63 million (10.25 million USD) in 2023.


Raphael Eugênio de Souza, the Federal Revenue Service's chief coordinator for cracking down on smuggling and tax evasion, stated that penalties on businesses are intended to deter them from repeating illegal behavior. The suspension of a company's tax identification number will hinder its normal operations, including the inability to conduct banking transactions, issue invoices, and pay suppliers.


In addition, the tax authorities have warned that there is a link between the illegal e-cigarette market and funding organized crime. Purchasing smuggled goods from small shops is actually supporting criminal networks, which increase profits through a variety of illegal activities.


In addition, authorities will increase efforts to crack down on the sale of e-cigarettes on online platforms and applications.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Spain’s new e-cigarette e-liquid tax, in force since April 1, raises €26 million through November
Spain’s new e-cigarette e-liquid tax, in force since April 1, raises €26 million through November
Spain’s Tax Agency monthly collection report shows the new tax on e-cigarette e-liquids, in force since April 1, raised €26 million through November, including €4 million in November. The levy began three months later than the usual fiscal timetable to allow the sector to adapt, making 2025 the first year in which vaping products are taxed under a specific category.
Dec.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
British Museum Ends Long-Running Sponsorship with Japan Tobacco International
British Museum Ends Long-Running Sponsorship with Japan Tobacco International
According to The Guardian, the British Museum has ended its 15-year sponsorship with Japan Tobacco International after government inquiries into whether the deal breached WHO tobacco-control rules. Critics had long opposed the partnership, while the museum said sponsorship remains essential for its financial stability and public access.
Nov.20
Kardinal to Launch Dual Open-System Devices Globally in Q1 2026
Kardinal to Launch Dual Open-System Devices Globally in Q1 2026
Kardinal OS and Syn Signal Strategic Expansion in Open-System ENDS
Dec.31
South Korea’s Tobacco Law Amendment to Include Synthetic Nicotine, Projected to Add Up to $340 Million in Local Tax Revenue
South Korea’s Tobacco Law Amendment to Include Synthetic Nicotine, Projected to Add Up to $340 Million in Local Tax Revenue
Following the National Assembly’s approval of amendments to the Tobacco Business Act on September 22, redefining tobacco to include synthetic nicotine, the Korea Institute of Local Finance (KILF) estimates that local governments could gain between $37 million and $340 million in additional tax revenue in 2025 from tobacco consumption and local education taxes.
Nov.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Rosstandart: packaging and design requirements for vapes to be tightened in early 2026
Rosstandart: packaging and design requirements for vapes to be tightened in early 2026
Rosstandart head Anton Shalaev told TASS that Russia will tighten requirements for the packaging and design of vapes and other electronic nicotine delivery systems in early 2026.
Jan.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Juul, NJOY and Altria Clash Over Use of UCSF Public Documents in U.S. Patent Litigation
Juul, NJOY and Altria Clash Over Use of UCSF Public Documents in U.S. Patent Litigation
Juul Labs has asked a U.S. federal court to prevent NJOY and Altria from using documents stored in a public UCSF database in an ongoing patent lawsuit, arguing they are protected by attorney–client privilege. The defendants say the files have long been public and may contain evidence relevant to Juul’s patent conduct.
Dec.29 by 2FIRSTS.ai