Kentucky E-Cigarette Retailers Appeal Against Sales Ban Rejection

Aug.28.2024
Kentucky E-Cigarette Retailers Appeal Against Sales Ban Rejection
Kentucky e-cigarette retailers appeal against dismissal of lawsuit challenging partial ban on sales in 2024.

According to a report on August 28th by news.yahoo, Kentucky e-cigarette retailers have filed an appeal regarding the dismissal of their lawsuit challenging the partial ban on the sale of e-cigarette products in 2024.


It has been reported that in late July, a judge at the Franklin Circuit Court in Kentucky dismissed the challenge by retailors against the 2024 law. Greg Troutman of the Kentucky Smoke Free Association, representing e-cigarette retailers, filed a notice of appeal to the Kentucky State Court this past Tuesday.


Troughtman represents retailers in a lawsuit against Kentucky's Alcohol Beverage Control Commissioner Allyson Taylor and Secretary of State Michael Adams, arguing that the new law failed to pass constitutional muster. However, Franklin Circuit Court Judge Thomas Wingate disagreed with this view in his ruling on July 29, stating that the law did not violate the state constitution and dismissing the challenge.


House Bill 11 was passed during the legislative session of 2024 and will go into effect on January 1st of next year. Supporters of the bill believe that by restricting the sale of e-cigarettes to only "authorized products" or those that have obtained certification from the US FDA's "safe harbor", it can effectively curb the use of e-cigarettes by minors.


Opponents argue that the bill will harm small businesses, leading to market monopolization by large retailers, and potentially even steer adolescents towards traditional cigarettes.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Vape sellers sue to block Texas law banning e-liquids from China and other “foreign adversaries”
Vape sellers sue to block Texas law banning e-liquids from China and other “foreign adversaries”
A group of vape distributors and retailers has sued to block enforcement of a Texas law that criminalizes selling or marketing vape products containing e-liquids made wholly or partly in China or in countries designated as “foreign adversaries” by the U.S. Commerce Secretary. The plaintiffs argue the law violates the U.S. Constitution because only Congress may regulate foreign commerce.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysia High Court Sets May 15 Ruling on NGOs’ Challenge to Vape Nicotine Poisons List Exemption
Malaysia High Court Sets May 15 Ruling on NGOs’ Challenge to Vape Nicotine Poisons List Exemption
Malaysia’s High Court has fixed May 15, 2026, to deliver its decision on a judicial review application by three NGOs challenging the government’s move to exempt vape liquids and gels from the Poisons List. The applicants argue the March 31, 2023 delisting effectively deregulated vape products and created a prolonged gap until Act 852 took effect in October 2024.
Jan.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Imperial Brands to Close Langenhagen Cigarette Factory by 2027
Imperial Brands to Close Langenhagen Cigarette Factory by 2027
Imperial Brands said it will gradually close the Reemtsma factory in Langenhagen near Hanover by 2027 after efforts to find a buyer failed to produce a sustainable agreement. The factory has produced cigarettes since 1971 and currently affects around 600 employees. The company said it had examined all realistic options over recent months but did not receive a binding offer from a potential buyer.
Mar.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
South Dakota Legislature Approves Two Nicotine Licensing Bills Pending Governor’s Decision
South Dakota Legislature Approves Two Nicotine Licensing Bills Pending Governor’s Decision
The South Dakota Legislature gave final approval on Tuesday to two proposals requiring state licenses for businesses that sell nicotine products. Under the bills, wholesalers, distributors and retailers of nicotine products in the state would need to be licensed by the government.
Mar.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Russian consumer group urges Kremlin administration to reject regional vape sales bans
Russian consumer group urges Kremlin administration to reject regional vape sales bans
A Russian consumer organization has urged the Presidential Administration to block proposals that would let regions ban ENDS and e-liquid sales, warning it would create fragmented regulation and turbocharge the illicit market. The group cites WHO statistics and overseas experiences to argue for a more targeted regulatory model.
Feb.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Commissioner Stresses “Predictability” as Science Chief Addresses Industry Uncertainty
FDA Commissioner Stresses “Predictability” as Science Chief Addresses Industry Uncertainty
FDA Commissioner Marty Makary briefly appeared at the February 10 PMTA roundtable, underscoring the importance of regulatory predictability. At the close of the session, Office of Science Director Matthew Farrelly responded to industry concerns over review uncertainty, stating the agency will issue a written summary of feedback, while reiterating that no fixed quantitative risk benchmark governs authorization decisions.
Feb.11