Victory Vape Fined for Illegal Advertising of Nicotine E-cigarettes

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai

Jan.22.2024

Victory Vape Fined for Illegal Advertising of Nicotine E-cigarettes

According to Radical News, Australia's TGA has fined Victory Vape $157,752 for alleged illegal advertising of nicotine e-cigarette products.

According to a report by "The Radical News," the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) of Australia has issued a fine of 157,752 Australian dollars (approximately 104,000 US dollars) to online retailer Victory Vape. This case involves allegations that the company illegally advertised nicotine e-cigarette products.

The company received six fines amounting to $112,680 AUD, while the two directors each received six fines totaling $45,072 AUD.

The introduction of these fines follows similar actions by the TGA against other companies, including issuing fines totaling $588,840 to a group of companies whose actions involved the illegal importation of nicotine e-cigarettes containing prohibited ingredients that did not meet the relevant standards.

In Australia, nicotine e-cigarettes are classified as prescription drugs and cannot be advertised to the general public. Engaging in such advertising is considered a violation of the 1989 Therapeutic Goods Act, which could result in severe fines and even civil or criminal court proceedings.

References:

[1] Online vape store fined for unlawful advertising

Also Read:

[1] E-cigarette Waste Recycling Pilot Program in Western Australia

[2] Dangerous Impact of E-Cigarettes on Australian's Health

[3] Australia Invests $188.5 Million to Combat Illegal Tobacco Trade

#Legislation #Open system e-cigarettes #Australia #Oceania #E-cigarette #E-cigarettes and Tobacco #Illegal e-cigarettes #Nicotine e-cigarettes #Nicotine-containing e-cigarettes

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn

Notice

1. This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2. The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3. This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4. Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

Copyright

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

AI Assistance Disclaimer

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Tobacco harm reduction advocates criticize COP11 for limiting public participation and call for inclusion of harm reduction products in discussions

The Conference of the Parties to the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (COP11) will convene in Geneva in November to discuss global tobacco control policies. Tobacco harm reduction advocates worry that the meeting may only avoid further policy damage without achieving substantive progress. They point out that COP11 limits public participation and call for strengthened discussion on safe nicotine products.

Sep.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai

Special Report | Anti-Vaping Campaign in the Baltics Goes Sideways

2Firsts analyzes vaping regulations across the Baltic states. Following Latvia’s flavor ban, tax revenues fell and the black market expanded, while similar measures in Estonia and Lithuania have also failed to deliver results. The region’s anti-vaping policies are now triggering market imbalance and policy reassessment.

Oct.13

Juul Wins UK Court Injunction, Ending Five-Year Legal Battle Against Chinese Vape Infringers

The UK High Court has granted U.S. e-cigarette manufacturer Juul Labs a permanent injunction against four Chinese companies, bringing an end to a five-year patent and trademark infringement case. The defendants — Greensun Technology, Ouch, Gaish, and Airsmo Tech — failed to respond to any court communications or legal filings.

Oct.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai

U.S. 25 Attorneys General Urge Shopify to Block Illegal E-Cigarette Sales

California Attorney General Rob Bonta and the City of New York co-led a bipartisan coalition of 25 attorneys general in urging Shopify Inc. to take stronger measures against merchants selling illegal e-cigarettes and other tobacco products through its platform. The letter calls for cooperation between Shopify and U.S. states to address the persistent sale of unapproved vaping products.