Victory Vape Fined for Illegal Advertising of Nicotine E-cigarettes

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.22.2024
Victory Vape Fined for Illegal Advertising of Nicotine E-cigarettes
According to Radical News, Australia's TGA has fined Victory Vape $157,752 for alleged illegal advertising of nicotine e-cigarette products.

According to a report by "The Radical News," the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) of Australia has issued a fine of 157,752 Australian dollars (approximately 104,000 US dollars) to online retailer Victory Vape. This case involves allegations that the company illegally advertised nicotine e-cigarette products.

 

The company received six fines amounting to $112,680 AUD, while the two directors each received six fines totaling $45,072 AUD.

 

The introduction of these fines follows similar actions by the TGA against other companies, including issuing fines totaling $588,840 to a group of companies whose actions involved the illegal importation of nicotine e-cigarettes containing prohibited ingredients that did not meet the relevant standards.

 

In Australia, nicotine e-cigarettes are classified as prescription drugs and cannot be advertised to the general public. Engaging in such advertising is considered a violation of the 1989 Therapeutic Goods Act, which could result in severe fines and even civil or criminal court proceedings.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Goyang City Urges Relevant Sellers to Apply for Tobacco Retailer Designation by April 23
Goyang City Urges Relevant Sellers to Apply for Tobacco Retailer Designation by April 23
Goyang Special City in South Korea said it has informed local sellers about the revised Tobacco Business Act, which will take effect on April 24, 2026, and urged them to apply for tobacco retailer designation.
Mar.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Smoore, Distributors Move to Toss Cannabis Vape Price-Fixing Suit
Smoore, Distributors Move to Toss Cannabis Vape Price-Fixing Suit
Several vape manufacturers and distributors, including Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co. Ltd., Smoore International Holdings, 3Win Corp., Jupiter Research LLC, Canna Brand Solutions, and Greenlane Holdings Inc., have filed motions seeking dismissal of consumer claims in consolidated antitrust litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Events
Feb.24
Australian Border Force Deputy Commissioner Meets China Tobacco Regulator as Illicit Tobacco Enforcement Intensifies
Australian Border Force Deputy Commissioner Meets China Tobacco Regulator as Illicit Tobacco Enforcement Intensifies
ABF Deputy Commissioner Tim Fitzgerald visited Beijing for talks with China’s STMA. The meeting follows several exchanges between Australian enforcement agencies and China’s tobacco regulator in recent years. The discussions come as Australia intensifies efforts to combat illicit tobacco and vaping products, including large seizures at the border, while the country’s strict tobacco and vape policies continue to spark debate over their impact on the growth of black markets.
Mar.09
Indonesian Parliament Reviews Narcotics Law Draft, May Include Vape Ban Proposal
Indonesian Parliament Reviews Narcotics Law Draft, May Include Vape Ban Proposal
According to Beritasatu, Commission III of the Indonesian House of Representatives is reviewing the Draft Law on Narcotics and Psychotropics and considering including a proposal from the National Narcotics Agency (BNN) to ban vapes.
Apr.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Exclusive | China Starts Mandatory National Standards Process for Heated Cigarettes and Nicotine Pouches
Exclusive | China Starts Mandatory National Standards Process for Heated Cigarettes and Nicotine Pouches
China has launched mandatory national standards work for heated cigarettes and nicotine pouches, further formalizing regulation of both categories. The move may help lay groundwork for future market entry, but does not signal imminent domestic commercialization.
Apr.15
Ohio Supreme Court takes up appeal that could define state limits on illegal vape sales enforcement
Ohio Supreme Court takes up appeal that could define state limits on illegal vape sales enforcement
The Ohio Supreme Court has agreed to hear Attorney General Dave Yost’s appeal seeking to revive lawsuits against three Ohio vape retailers. Lower courts dismissed the cases, finding that federal law governs whether vaping products may be marketed and sold.
Mar.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai