Vietnam Ministry of Justice suggests redefining e-cigarette and heated tobacco

Mar.26.2025
Vietnam Ministry of Justice suggests redefining e-cigarette and heated tobacco
Vietnam's Justice Ministry suggests redefining e-cigarette and heated tobacco, emphasizing personal responsibility in adhering to regulations.

Key points:

  • The Vietnamese Ministry of Justice has recommended redefining e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products to clarify the differences between the two, in order to prevent ambiguity in regulations and enforcement challenges.
  • The Department of Justice opposes sending penalty notices to illegally occupied residential units and emphasizes that compliance with e-cigarette and heated tobacco regulations should be the individual's responsibility.
  • Companies facing difficulties in complying with regulations are advised by the Ministry of Justice to fully evaluate policies and seek input from businesses before implementing penalty measures.

According to a report by Tienphong on March 26th, The Ministry of Justice has just released Review Report No. 68 (68/BCTĐ-BTP) on the Draft Decree amending and supplementing several articles of Decree No. 117/2020/ND-CP dated September 28, 2020, the Ministry of Justice has suggested redefining the concepts related to e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products in the draft during the review process.

 

The Ministry of Justice pointed out that in order to ensure the unity of the legal system and the comprehensiveness of national management, especially in the regulation of activities such as investment, production, and operation, the definitions of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco should be clearly stated in relevant regulations.

 

E-cigarettes and heated tobacco products are two distinct concepts that have significant differences in their construction, operation, ingredients, harm, and target users. Combining the two into one concept could potentially create challenges in developing preventive measures or selecting appropriate penalties. Furthermore, the definitions of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products in the draft legislation may be too broad, potentially including non-smoking devices in the scope of punishments, leading to practical enforcement difficulties for law enforcement agencies.

 

The Department of Justice has voiced objections to the proposal in the draft regarding sending penalty notices to illegally settled units, stating that this could lead to unnecessary social impact and punishment, such as affecting individuals' work or study environments. At the same time, compliance with e-cigarette and heated tobacco regulations should be a personal responsibility and should not become a burden for work or study units, as this falls under the individual's realm.

 

Furthermore, companies engaged in investment, production, and export of components for e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products are facing numerous challenges in complying with relevant regulations. Especially with the passing of Resolution 173 by Congress on November 30, 2024, which explicitly bans the use of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products, these companies are now confronting even greater hurdles.

 

The Department of Justice suggests that before implementing penalties for e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products, relevant regulatory policies should be thoroughly evaluated and public and industry opinions should be sought to ensure the government makes decisions with a comprehensive understanding. This is particularly crucial when e-cigarette and heated tobacco device manufacturers are facing challenges.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Bringing Tax and Insurance Into Nicotine Regulation: Insights From a Tobacco Harm-Reduction Report
Bringing Tax and Insurance Into Nicotine Regulation: Insights From a Tobacco Harm-Reduction Report
A smoke-free nicotine policy report argues that tobacco harm reduction should move beyond product bans and health warnings into tax policy, insurance pricing and risk-based regulation. While some projections remain open to debate, the report highlights a wider challenge: nicotine products, technologies and consumer behavior have changed sharply over the past decade, and regulatory systems may need new tools to better align tobacco control with harm-reduction goals.
Jun.08
Cambodia Moves to Draft New Tobacco Control Strategy Targeting Illicit Products and E-Cigarette Spread
Cambodia Moves to Draft New Tobacco Control Strategy Targeting Illicit Products and E-Cigarette Spread
Cambodian Health Minister Cheang Ra has called for the development of a tobacco control strategy for 2027–2031, with the goal of reducing tobacco use by 30% by 2030. The directive was issued during a Tobacco Product Control Committee meeting in Phnom Penh. Priority areas include reducing tobacco use, protecting the public from secondhand smoke, tackling illegal and counterfeit tobacco products, and preventing the spread of e-cigarettes.
Apr.29 by 2FIRSTS.ai
PMI Highlights 43 Million Smoke-Free Users at Stockholm Summit
PMI Highlights 43 Million Smoke-Free Users at Stockholm Summit
Philip Morris International says about 43 million adults worldwide now use its smoke-free products, with nearly 70% having stopped using cigarettes and smoke-free products accounting for about 43% of its net revenues.
Jun.18
2Firsts Data|China Vape Exports Sink to Three-Year April Low After Tax Rebate Ends, Falling to $694 Million
2Firsts Data|China Vape Exports Sink to Three-Year April Low After Tax Rebate Ends, Falling to $694 Million
China’s e-cigarette export value declined to $694 million in April 2026, marking the lowest April level in the past three years. The data is notable because April was the first full month after China removed export VAT rebates for certain e-cigarette products. Compared with April 2025, export value fell 20.9%; compared with April 2024, it was down 22.3%. Month-on-month, exports dropped 23.2% from March 2026.
Special Report
May.23
New West Virginia Vape Law Begins, With Packaging and Ad Restrictions Ahead
New West Virginia Vape Law Begins, With Packaging and Ad Restrictions Ahead
West Virginia’s Vape Safety Act will take effect Thursday, requiring vapor products sold in vape and smoke shops to carry health warnings, legal-age notices, manufacturer information and ingredient disclosures, while introducing new licensing and enforcement rules.
Jun.10
U.S. Military Nicotine Policy Sparks Debate as Nicotine Pouches Enter Discussion
U.S. Military Nicotine Policy Sparks Debate as Nicotine Pouches Enter Discussion
An opinion article published by Stars and Stripes argued that the Pentagon’s January nicotine clinical guidelines overemphasize abstinence, fail to reflect the reality that about 30% of active-duty personnel use nicotine, and do not address nicotine pouches as potential harm-reduction products.
Industry Insight
Jun.08