Vietnam Ministry of Justice suggests redefining e-cigarette and heated tobacco

Mar.26.2025
Vietnam Ministry of Justice suggests redefining e-cigarette and heated tobacco
Vietnam's Justice Ministry suggests redefining e-cigarette and heated tobacco, emphasizing personal responsibility in adhering to regulations.

Key points:

  • The Vietnamese Ministry of Justice has recommended redefining e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products to clarify the differences between the two, in order to prevent ambiguity in regulations and enforcement challenges.
  • The Department of Justice opposes sending penalty notices to illegally occupied residential units and emphasizes that compliance with e-cigarette and heated tobacco regulations should be the individual's responsibility.
  • Companies facing difficulties in complying with regulations are advised by the Ministry of Justice to fully evaluate policies and seek input from businesses before implementing penalty measures.

According to a report by Tienphong on March 26th, The Ministry of Justice has just released Review Report No. 68 (68/BCTĐ-BTP) on the Draft Decree amending and supplementing several articles of Decree No. 117/2020/ND-CP dated September 28, 2020, the Ministry of Justice has suggested redefining the concepts related to e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products in the draft during the review process.

 

The Ministry of Justice pointed out that in order to ensure the unity of the legal system and the comprehensiveness of national management, especially in the regulation of activities such as investment, production, and operation, the definitions of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco should be clearly stated in relevant regulations.

 

E-cigarettes and heated tobacco products are two distinct concepts that have significant differences in their construction, operation, ingredients, harm, and target users. Combining the two into one concept could potentially create challenges in developing preventive measures or selecting appropriate penalties. Furthermore, the definitions of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products in the draft legislation may be too broad, potentially including non-smoking devices in the scope of punishments, leading to practical enforcement difficulties for law enforcement agencies.

 

The Department of Justice has voiced objections to the proposal in the draft regarding sending penalty notices to illegally settled units, stating that this could lead to unnecessary social impact and punishment, such as affecting individuals' work or study environments. At the same time, compliance with e-cigarette and heated tobacco regulations should be a personal responsibility and should not become a burden for work or study units, as this falls under the individual's realm.

 

Furthermore, companies engaged in investment, production, and export of components for e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products are facing numerous challenges in complying with relevant regulations. Especially with the passing of Resolution 173 by Congress on November 30, 2024, which explicitly bans the use of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products, these companies are now confronting even greater hurdles.

 

The Department of Justice suggests that before implementing penalties for e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products, relevant regulatory policies should be thoroughly evaluated and public and industry opinions should be sought to ensure the government makes decisions with a comprehensive understanding. This is particularly crucial when e-cigarette and heated tobacco device manufacturers are facing challenges.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
According to Law360 on August 31, 2026, a federal judge in North Carolina ruled that a patent sublicense between R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and Juul Labs Inc. relieves Reynolds of its obligation to continue paying royalties to Altria Client Services LLC over Vuse Alto. A jury had previously found that Vuse Alto infringed three Altria patents and awarded approximately $95.2 million in past damages, after which Reynolds was ordered to pay an ongoing royalty equal to 5.25% of positive net sales. The new ruling finds that a valid sublicense can eliminate future infringement, potentially ending what Altria described as hundreds of millions of dollars in future royalties.
Sep.01
Japan Survey Finds 49.5% Would Cut Tobacco Use if Prices Rise, 64.6% Show Interest in Nicotine-Free Alternatives
Japan Survey Finds 49.5% Would Cut Tobacco Use if Prices Rise, 64.6% Show Interest in Nicotine-Free Alternatives
A September online survey commissioned by Japanese smoking-accessories company Lightec found that 49.5% of respondents would consider reducing tobacco use if prices rose further, while 25.1% would consider switching to cheaper brands and 14.5% would consider using or combining alternatives such as vapes and nicotine-free herbal sticks. Another 64.6% expressed some level of interest in such alternatives. The survey covered 1,088 respondents aged 20 to 70 and was conducted by a company that sells NICOLESS nicotine-free vaping and herbal-stick products, meaning its findings should not be treated as representative of Japan's smoking population.
DATA
Oct.12
Product | PMJ Adds Bold Ruby to IQOS ILUMA i Lineup in Japan, Convenience-Store Rollout Starts Sept. 29
Product | PMJ Adds Bold Ruby to IQOS ILUMA i Lineup in Japan, Convenience-Store Rollout Starts Sept. 29
Philip Morris Japan (PMJ) launched Bold Ruby as a new regular color for the IQOS ILUMA i and IQOS ILUMA i ONE in Japan on September 16, 2026, priced at JPY 6,980 and JPY 3,980, respectively. Initial sales began through IQOS online and physical channels, with convenience stores and selected tobacco retailers set to follow from September 29. Bold Ruby is a regular rather than limited-edition colorway and is available for the ILUMA i and ILUMA i ONE, but not the ILUMA i PRIME. The release does not involve changes to the devices' core hardware or functions.
Sep.22
On-Site Report | CTP Details PMTA Backlog, 180-Day Review Goal and sPMTA Process
On-Site Report | CTP Details PMTA Backlog, 180-Day Review Goal and sPMTA Process
FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products detailed new PMTA review data and process changes at the 2026 FDLI conference. Pending PMTAs fell from about 450,000 at the start of 2025 to 135,000 by September 2026. CTP also discussed its 180-day review goal, current sPMTA pilot, alternate-supplier planning, more than 50,300 pending SE reports, and lessons from the nicotine pouch pilot already being applied to ENDS review.
Regulations
Oct.07
Product | JT to Launch MEVIUS Tropical Option in Japan, Expanding Ploom Tobacco Stick Lineup to 32
Product | JT to Launch MEVIUS Tropical Option in Japan, Expanding Ploom Tobacco Stick Lineup to 32
Japan Tobacco (JT) will launch MEVIUS Tropical Option, a new tobacco stick for Ploom, nationwide in Japan from October 6, 2026. The capsule-format product combines mango-oriented sweetness with menthol cooling, adding a tropical flavor to the MEVIUS Ploom tobacco-stick lineup for the first time. Each pack contains 20 sticks and will launch at JPY 590. The product is compatible with all Ploom devices, and its addition will expand the Ploom tobacco-stick portfolio to 32 variants.
Sep.08
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23