Vietnam Ministry of Justice suggests redefining e-cigarette and heated tobacco

Mar.26.2025
Vietnam Ministry of Justice suggests redefining e-cigarette and heated tobacco
Vietnam's Justice Ministry suggests redefining e-cigarette and heated tobacco, emphasizing personal responsibility in adhering to regulations.

Key points:

  • The Vietnamese Ministry of Justice has recommended redefining e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products to clarify the differences between the two, in order to prevent ambiguity in regulations and enforcement challenges.
  • The Department of Justice opposes sending penalty notices to illegally occupied residential units and emphasizes that compliance with e-cigarette and heated tobacco regulations should be the individual's responsibility.
  • Companies facing difficulties in complying with regulations are advised by the Ministry of Justice to fully evaluate policies and seek input from businesses before implementing penalty measures.

According to a report by Tienphong on March 26th, The Ministry of Justice has just released Review Report No. 68 (68/BCTĐ-BTP) on the Draft Decree amending and supplementing several articles of Decree No. 117/2020/ND-CP dated September 28, 2020, the Ministry of Justice has suggested redefining the concepts related to e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products in the draft during the review process.

 

The Ministry of Justice pointed out that in order to ensure the unity of the legal system and the comprehensiveness of national management, especially in the regulation of activities such as investment, production, and operation, the definitions of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco should be clearly stated in relevant regulations.

 

E-cigarettes and heated tobacco products are two distinct concepts that have significant differences in their construction, operation, ingredients, harm, and target users. Combining the two into one concept could potentially create challenges in developing preventive measures or selecting appropriate penalties. Furthermore, the definitions of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products in the draft legislation may be too broad, potentially including non-smoking devices in the scope of punishments, leading to practical enforcement difficulties for law enforcement agencies.

 

The Department of Justice has voiced objections to the proposal in the draft regarding sending penalty notices to illegally settled units, stating that this could lead to unnecessary social impact and punishment, such as affecting individuals' work or study environments. At the same time, compliance with e-cigarette and heated tobacco regulations should be a personal responsibility and should not become a burden for work or study units, as this falls under the individual's realm.

 

Furthermore, companies engaged in investment, production, and export of components for e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products are facing numerous challenges in complying with relevant regulations. Especially with the passing of Resolution 173 by Congress on November 30, 2024, which explicitly bans the use of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products, these companies are now confronting even greater hurdles.

 

The Department of Justice suggests that before implementing penalties for e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products, relevant regulatory policies should be thoroughly evaluated and public and industry opinions should be sought to ensure the government makes decisions with a comprehensive understanding. This is particularly crucial when e-cigarette and heated tobacco device manufacturers are facing challenges.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
Product | KUMI SCENIC 50K Offers Nicotine and 6-Methyl Nicotine Versions as 6-MN Products Appear in Multiple U.S. State Directories, With Louisiana Listing FDA Exemption
Product | KUMI SCENIC 50K Offers Nicotine and 6-Methyl Nicotine Versions as 6-MN Products Appear in Multiple U.S. State Directories, With Louisiana Listing FDA Exemption
An October 2026 review of U.S. state vapor product directories found KUMI 6 SCENIC 50K listed in Louisiana and Nebraska. Louisiana classifies 20 related product entries as “FDA EXEMPTION.” The SCENIC platform is marketed in both conventional nicotine-salt and NoNic6 formulations, each advertised with 22mL e-liquid capacity and up to 50,000 puffs. U.S. wholesaler Midwest Goods listed both versions in August 2025 with a suggested retail price of $19.99 each. The NoNic6 version is associated with 6-methylnicotine and is also marketed by some distributors as “nicotine-free.”
product
Oct.27
F1 Faces Renewed Pressure Over Tobacco and Nicotine Sponsorships as 67 Groups Target ZYN and VELO Ahead of Madrid Race
F1 Faces Renewed Pressure Over Tobacco and Nicotine Sponsorships as 67 Groups Target ZYN and VELO Ahead of Madrid Race
Ahead of the Formula 1 race in Madrid, 67 Spanish and international public-health, medical and consumer organizations have sent an open letter to F1 President and CEO Stefano Domenicali calling for an end to sponsorships linked to the tobacco and nicotine industry, including nicotine pouches, vaping products and heated tobacco. The letter focuses on Philip Morris International’s ZYN partnership with Ferrari and British American Tobacco’s long-running partnership with McLaren and exposure for VELO. The campaign follows a March letter in which more than 160 organizations worldwide made a similar request to Formula 1.
Sep.10
Special Report | From Oversupply to Supply Gaps: Global Tobacco Leaf Markets Diverge Ahead of 2027
Special Report | From Oversupply to Supply Gaps: Global Tobacco Leaf Markets Diverge Ahead of 2027
Global tobacco leaf markets diverged sharply in 2026, with India cutting authorised FCV production amid oversupply while Malawi faced a supply shortfall. U.S. demand improved in some leaf categories, but growers in Brazil, Colombia, Tanzania and Zimbabwe faced pressure from prices, buyer access, costs and weather. With nicotine consumption patterns also shifting, 2027 will test whether supply, demand and grower profitability can move back toward balance.
Oct.26
China Tobacco Yunnan files patent for cellulose-free nicotine pouch scaffold to replace microcrystalline cellulose
China Tobacco Yunnan files patent for cellulose-free nicotine pouch scaffold to replace microcrystalline cellulose
China Tobacco Yunnan Industrial Co., Ltd. has filed a patent application for a cellulose-free scaffold material for nicotine pouches, proposing a combination of bioceramic material, polydextrose and sugar alcohols to replace conventional microcrystalline cellulose and cellulose derivatives. The filing aims to address issues including powdery mouthfeel, residue and limited release control, while also reducing reliance on existing cellulose-based patent portfolios. In patent examples, one fast-release formulation reached a nicotine release rate of 50% at 10 minutes and more than 90% at 20 minutes.
Sep.02
UK Directors Banned After 352,688 Vapes Imported From China Were Misdeclared as Medical Nebulizers in £15 Million Tax Case
UK Directors Banned After 352,688 Vapes Imported From China Were Misdeclared as Medical Nebulizers in £15 Million Tax Case
The UK Insolvency Service said YSK Enterprises imported large quantities of vapes from China in 2023, with a shipment addressed to the company declared as medical nebulizers before Border Force found 352,688 vaping products. HMRC calculated nearly £15 million ($20.3 million) in unpaid VAT and customs duty, alongside about £437,000 in corporation tax. Two directors were disqualified for nine years. The case predates the UK's Vaping Products Duty, which will introduce vape-specific excise and duty-stamp requirements from October 2026.
Regulations
Sep.11