Vietnam Ministry of Justice suggests redefining e-cigarette and heated tobacco

Mar.26.2025
Vietnam Ministry of Justice suggests redefining e-cigarette and heated tobacco
Vietnam's Justice Ministry suggests redefining e-cigarette and heated tobacco, emphasizing personal responsibility in adhering to regulations.

Key points:

  • The Vietnamese Ministry of Justice has recommended redefining e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products to clarify the differences between the two, in order to prevent ambiguity in regulations and enforcement challenges.
  • The Department of Justice opposes sending penalty notices to illegally occupied residential units and emphasizes that compliance with e-cigarette and heated tobacco regulations should be the individual's responsibility.
  • Companies facing difficulties in complying with regulations are advised by the Ministry of Justice to fully evaluate policies and seek input from businesses before implementing penalty measures.

According to a report by Tienphong on March 26th, The Ministry of Justice has just released Review Report No. 68 (68/BCTĐ-BTP) on the Draft Decree amending and supplementing several articles of Decree No. 117/2020/ND-CP dated September 28, 2020, the Ministry of Justice has suggested redefining the concepts related to e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products in the draft during the review process.

 

The Ministry of Justice pointed out that in order to ensure the unity of the legal system and the comprehensiveness of national management, especially in the regulation of activities such as investment, production, and operation, the definitions of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco should be clearly stated in relevant regulations.

 

E-cigarettes and heated tobacco products are two distinct concepts that have significant differences in their construction, operation, ingredients, harm, and target users. Combining the two into one concept could potentially create challenges in developing preventive measures or selecting appropriate penalties. Furthermore, the definitions of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products in the draft legislation may be too broad, potentially including non-smoking devices in the scope of punishments, leading to practical enforcement difficulties for law enforcement agencies.

 

The Department of Justice has voiced objections to the proposal in the draft regarding sending penalty notices to illegally settled units, stating that this could lead to unnecessary social impact and punishment, such as affecting individuals' work or study environments. At the same time, compliance with e-cigarette and heated tobacco regulations should be a personal responsibility and should not become a burden for work or study units, as this falls under the individual's realm.

 

Furthermore, companies engaged in investment, production, and export of components for e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products are facing numerous challenges in complying with relevant regulations. Especially with the passing of Resolution 173 by Congress on November 30, 2024, which explicitly bans the use of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products, these companies are now confronting even greater hurdles.

 

The Department of Justice suggests that before implementing penalties for e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products, relevant regulatory policies should be thoroughly evaluated and public and industry opinions should be sought to ensure the government makes decisions with a comprehensive understanding. This is particularly crucial when e-cigarette and heated tobacco device manufacturers are facing challenges.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Australia’s Tobacco Tax Debate Intensifies as One Nation’s Barnaby Joyce Warns of Illicit Market Growth
Australia’s Tobacco Tax Debate Intensifies as One Nation’s Barnaby Joyce Warns of Illicit Market Growth
Australian One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce has criticised continued tobacco excise increases, arguing that higher taxes are driving consumers toward illicit tobacco markets and benefiting organised crime groups.
Regulations
Jul.13 by 2Firsts Perspectives
U.S. Appeals Court Says BAT Must Face Class Action Over Cigarette Labels
U.S. Appeals Court Says BAT Must Face Class Action Over Cigarette Labels
A U.S. appeals court ruled that British American Tobacco (BAT) must continue facing a consumer class action lawsuit over cigarette labels. The ruling allows the case to proceed but does not determine that BAT violated the law or is liable for damages. The case highlights ongoing legal risks facing major tobacco companies related to product labeling, consumer disclosures and product liability claims.
Jul.31
Australia-China Operation Dismantles Tobacco Smuggling Network: 112 Containers, 60 Arrests and A$92 Million in Illicit Tobacco
Australia-China Operation Dismantles Tobacco Smuggling Network: 112 Containers, 60 Arrests and A$92 Million in Illicit Tobacco
According to The Maritime Executive on August 19, 2026, the Australian Border Force (ABF) and China’s Anti-Smuggling Bureau of General Administration of China Customs worked together to dismantle an international illicit tobacco smuggling network targeting Australia. According to information released by ABF on August 20, sustained information sharing and cooperation led to investigations into 112 shipping containers, with 91 found to contain illicit tobacco. Authorities seized more than 60 million cigarettes and 60 kilograms of loose-leaf tobacco, representing more than A$92 million in unpaid duties. More than 60 people suspected of involvement in the network were arrested in China.
Aug.20
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06
Russia Adds Vapes to “Strategic Goods” List, Illegal Cross-Border Trade Faces Up to Five Years in Prison
Russia Adds Vapes to “Strategic Goods” List, Illegal Cross-Border Trade Faces Up to Five Years in Prison
Russia will place e-cigarettes and related nicotine products under its “strategic goods” framework from August 20, 2026. According to TVP World’s report published on August 19, the newly listed items include e-cigarettes, electronic smoking devices, vape liquids and nicotine salts. Individuals who illegally move these products across Russia’s customs border or its state border with other Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) members could face up to five years in prison if shipment values exceed 100,000 rubles (about €1,000), provided all elements of a criminal offence are established.
Aug.20
Scottish Vape Display Rules Could Cost Businesses £61 Million, Affecting More Than 11,000 Retail Outlets
Scottish Vape Display Rules Could Cost Businesses £61 Million, Affecting More Than 11,000 Retail Outlets
A Scottish government impact assessment estimates that proposed vape display and packaging rules could create up to £61 million ($82 million) in compliance costs for businesses, affecting more than 11,000 retail outlets. The estimated costs are mainly linked to inventory adjustments, retail storage changes and the resources required for businesses to understand and implement the new requirements. The measures form part of the UK’s broader efforts to tighten vape regulation, particularly around product displays, packaging and sales practices.
Aug.10