We Vape" calls for stricter regulation on e-cigarettes

Sep.14.2024
We Vape" calls for stricter regulation on e-cigarettes
We Vape" tests UK officials' constituencies for illegal e-cigarette sales; calls for stricter regulations to protect public health.

According to a report by Talking Retail on September 13th, the UK e-cigarette advocacy group "We Vape" conducted tests in the constituencies of the Prime Minister and Health Secretary to discover whether illegal and unregulated e-cigarettes were being sold.


The founder of "We Vape," Mark Oates, stated that he was able to purchase e-cigarettes with a nicotine concentration of 5% in the constituencies of Keir Starmer's Holborn & St Pancras and Wes Streeting's Ilford North, which is more than double the 2% limit.


Oates also mentioned that the Tottenham constituency of Foreign Secretary David Lammy is a "hotbed" for illegal e-cigarettes, as he was able to purchase five of them in less than 30 minutes.


Otts said that this highlights the shocking failure of the Trade Standards Bureau when the Prime Minister is ready to announce the final Tobacco and E-Cigarette Act.


Our investigation has uncovered that the e-cigarette e-liquid tanks have a capacity that exceeds the 2ml limit by more than six times, with some capable of providing up to 7000 puffs. A regulated e-cigarette can typically deliver 600 to 1000 puffs.


We Vape" calls on the UK government to make three commitments:


The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) conducts pre-market checks on all e-cigarettes before they are released to ensure they comply with UK laws and prevent illegal e-cigarettes from appearing on shelves first. We need a self-funded licensing system where retailers must pay a fee to sell e-cigarettes, with funds used to support trading standards. This model is similar to the alcohol industry, meaning hefty fines or closure will be imposed on repeat offenders selling illegal products or selling to minors. To protect flavors, which we know help smokers transition from traditional cigarettes to e-cigarettes, experts at the University of Bristol believe that nearly 39% of smokers would "smoke more or not quit" when switching to e-cigarettes, and 14% of former smokers would "revert back to smoking" if their preferred flavors were restricted.


I was able to easily purchase illegal e-cigarettes in the Prime Minister and Health Secretary's own constituencies, which is shocking and suggests that more needs to be done to prevent them from being sold in the first place.


All e-cigarettes should be legally required to undergo testing and certification before being allowed for sale, in order to comply with UK law. To be honest, the fact that this is not currently the case is truly unbelievable.


The pre-sale certification will give wholesalers and retailers peace of mind that the e-cigarettes they are selling are legal and will allow those that are illegal to be taken off the shelves. In addition to the licensing system for e-cigarette retailers, it will ensure that businesses selling illegal e-cigarettes or caught selling to children can have their licenses revoked. Incorporating these measures into the Tobacco and E-Cigarette Act will ensure that e-cigarettes remain an effective way to quit smoking while protecting e-cigarette users, retailers, and parents.


Otz continued by adding,


I am able to walk into one store after another and ask for the most powerful e-cigarette, only to be sold some already illegal items. This happens all day long. Most vendors hardly even hide it, becoming so bold due to the lack of enforcement of trading standards.


The Tobacco and E-cigarette Act promises to impose more restrictions on e-cigarettes, which will be meaningless in London's rampant black market industry and only fuel the black market. Removing products does not remove demand, and dealers are eager for further bans. The Labour Party must understand that e-cigarettes are an important tool to help people quit smoking, but illegal products and children's access must be stopped through enforcing existing laws, rather than creating more laws to help illegal traders and reduce smokers' attempts to quit.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Reynolds Seeks to Join Altria Lawsuit Challenging FDA PMTA Rule and Calculation of 180-Day Deadline
Reynolds Seeks to Join Altria Lawsuit Challenging FDA PMTA Rule and Calculation of 180-Day Deadline
Three R.J. Reynolds companies are seeking to intervene in a lawsuit filed by Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY challenging the FDA's 2021 PMTA final rule. The companies dispute how the agency uses Acceptance and Filing reviews and completeness determinations to establish when the Tobacco Control Act's 180-day decision period begins. Reynolds has also linked prolonged PMTA reviews to competition from unauthorized vaping products. The FDA, meanwhile, has been accelerating reviews and reducing its backlog.
Sep.14
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
Charlie’s Bets on Age-Gating and 678 PMTA Assets as U.S. Vape Enforcement Landscape Shifts
Charlie’s Bets on Age-Gating and 678 PMTA Assets as U.S. Vape Enforcement Landscape Shifts
Charlie’s Holdings said in its latest shareholder letter that it is moving to commercialize PACHA products and monetize its PMTA assets as the FDA changes enforcement priorities for unauthorized ENDS products. Thirty PACHA SKUs were previously tentatively identified for a proposed public list of products that the FDA generally does not intend to prioritize for enforcement. Charlie’s is also preparing test-market sales of age-gated flavored disposables and says it currently holds 678 PMTA-related product assets while seeking additional strategic transactions and partnerships.
Sep.11
UK HMRC Issues One-Month Countdown Warning, Urges Vape Businesses to Prepare for New Tax Rules
UK HMRC Issues One-Month Countdown Warning, Urges Vape Businesses to Prepare for New Tax Rules
The UK’s Vaping Products Duty and Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme will take effect on October 1, 2026. All vaping liquids manufactured in or imported into the UK will face a flat excise duty of £2.20 per 10ml, whether or not they contain nicotine. Newly manufactured or imported products released onto the UK market from October 1 will require a valid duty stamp, while eligible existing unstamped inventory can continue to be sold through March 31, 2027. From April 1, 2027, all vaping products outside duty suspension must carry a valid stamp.
Sep.03
UK PM Andy Burnham Reshapes Vape Retail Rules as Licensing Could Raise Barriers for New Shops
UK PM Andy Burnham Reshapes Vape Retail Rules as Licensing Could Raise Barriers for New Shops
UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham is pushing a high street reform agenda that could give local authorities greater powers over commercial activity, including vape retail. The reforms could involve expanded planning powers and a potential vape retail licensing system, allowing councils to play a larger role in store locations and market access. The measures are part of the UK’s broader shift toward tighter vape regulation, although no nationwide vape retail restrictions have yet been implemented.
Aug.11
South Korea Vape Strategies Diverge as BAT Reconsiders Exit and PMI Takes VEEV to About 14,000 Stores
South Korea Vape Strategies Diverge as BAT Reconsiders Exit and PMI Takes VEEV to About 14,000 Stores
BAT Rothmans says it previously considered exiting South Korea's vaping market because of competitive pressure from unregulated products, but is now reassessing conditions following changes to the country's nicotine regulatory framework. Vuse and other BAT vaping products remain available through existing distribution channels. The statement followed a South Korean media report that interpreted BAT's broader withdrawal from selected Vapour markets as a full exit from South Korea. Meanwhile, Philip Morris International launched VEEV inPRIME in the country in June and began expanding distribution to around 14,000 convenience stores and other retail channels in July. The contrasting moves highlight differing investment strategies as South Korea's regulated vaping market evolves.
Aug.14