WeChat Announcement: Vape Included in Prohibited Items for Sale

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Mar.13.2024
WeChat Announcement: Vape Included in Prohibited Items for Sale
WeChat announces crackdown on personal accounts selling prohibited items to protect user information and rights.

On the evening of March 12th, the WeChat Security Center released a governance announcement titled "Announcement on Governing the Behavior of Personal WeChat Accounts Posting Information on the Sale of Prohibited Items." In order to regulate the information posting behavior of personal WeChat accounts, safeguard the information security and legitimate rights and interests of WeChat users, and for any personal WeChat accounts that publish, display, or disseminate various prohibited items for sale information in any form, the WeChat team will strictly follow the requirements of relevant national laws and regulations, as well as the provisions of the "Tencent WeChat Software License and Service Agreement" and the "WeChat Personal Account Usage Rules." Depending on the seriousness of the violation, a tiered punishment will be implemented: for violations, the content will be deleted upon discovery; for violating accounts, the WeChat account may be warned, restricted, or prohibited to use certain or all functions, the account may be temporarily suspended, or permanently banned.

 

Announcement disclosure: Personal WeChat accounts are not allowed to publish, display, or disseminate various prohibited items for sale information, including but not limited to the following examples:

 

01 Violating the rules by promoting pharmaceuticals or medical devices 

02 Tobacco and e-cigarette advertising 

03 Illegal categories such as sexual health products 

04 Controlled substances like aphrodisiacs 

05 Black and gray market items such as cheat software and fake IDs 

06 Pornographic and sexually suggestive content 

07 Weapons with killing power such as imitation guns, bows and arrows, controlled knives, and air guns 

08 Illegal loan content 

 

The WeChat Security Center reminds users that posting illegal or prohibited items for sale through social media platforms such as Moments, Video Accounts, or live streaming is a violation of rules. Assisting friends in promoting and selling illegal or prohibited items through reposts in Moments or WeChat groups can result in both the seller and reposter facing administrative penalties if issues arise.

 

Users are also reminded to cherish their WeChat account usage rights and not violate existing laws and regulations during use. The WeChat Security Center will handle violations according to relevant laws, regulations, and user agreement rules, and cooperate with authorities to protect the legitimate rights and interests of WeChat users and other parties.

 

The WeChat team is urging users to cherish their usage rights of WeChat accounts, strictly abide by laws and regulations, follow user agreements, and avoid engaging in any illegal activities. The WeChat Security Center will handle violations in accordance with laws and regulations and user agreements, and cooperate with relevant authorities to protect the legitimate rights and interests of WeChat users and other parties.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Louisiana lawmaker pushes bill to ban vape product sales within 300 feet of schools
Louisiana lawmaker pushes bill to ban vape product sales within 300 feet of schools
A Louisiana lawmaker has introduced HB 302, which would prohibit businesses from selling vapor products within 300 feet of schools. The bill would measure the distance by a person walking on the sidewalk from the nearest point on school property to the nearest point of the business. It would also give the commissioner authority to modify how the distance is calculated, while maintaining the 300-foot limit.
Feb.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Editorial says West Virginia’s HB 5437 “Vape Safety Act” goes too far, targeting residency and citizenship provisions
Editorial says West Virginia’s HB 5437 “Vape Safety Act” goes too far, targeting residency and citizenship provisions
A News and Sentinel editorial argues that West Virginia’s HB 5437, the “Vape Safety Act,” goes beyond reasonable regulation by adding provisions barring any part of a vape or smoke shop from being used as a residence and requiring owners to be U.S. citizens.
Feb.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
NACS Urges USTR to Address Illegal E-Cigarette Exports in China Trade Engagements
NACS Urges USTR to Address Illegal E-Cigarette Exports in China Trade Engagements
NACS submitted a comment letter to USTR in a proceeding examining unfair trade practices worldwide. The letter focuses on illicit nicotine products made in China and shipped to the United States in violation of U.S. law. NACS said the U.S. electronic nicotine delivery systems market has become dominated by illicit products, mainly disposable e-cigarettes manufactured in China and sold without the marketing authorization required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Apr.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Fontem Sues FDA Over Refusal-to-File Decision for Nicotine Pouch PMTAs
Fontem Sues FDA Over Refusal-to-File Decision for Nicotine Pouch PMTAs
According to a complaint filed on March 17 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fontem US, LLC and Texas retailer OM Investment, LLC sued the Food and Drug Administration and the Department of Health and Human Services over FDA’s refusal-to-file decision for certain Zone nicotine pouch PMTAs.
Mar.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Cambodia Siem Reap raid seizes over 10,000 e-cigarette items; two arrested
Cambodia Siem Reap raid seizes over 10,000 e-cigarette items; two arrested
Police in Siem Reap, Cambodia, seized 10,168 items of e-cigarette paraphernalia during a raid on February 28, 2026, and arrested two suspected sellers and owners of the premises.
Mar.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Special Report|Reynolds’ 337 Patent Case Ends, but a Harsher 337 Compliance Battle Now Targets the Entire Vape Supply Chain
Special Report|Reynolds’ 337 Patent Case Ends, but a Harsher 337 Compliance Battle Now Targets the Entire Vape Supply Chain
The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has terminated Investigation 337-TA-1410 after invalidating key vape patent claims asserted by R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, removing the immediate risk of import bans for dozens of companies. However, a new case—337-TA-1486—has already opened a more consequential legal front, shifting the focus from patent disputes to regulatory compliance across the vape supply chain, including PACT Act reporting, tax compliance, and FDA marketing authorization.
BAT
Mar.11