Brazil's E-Cigarette Ban Potential Tax Revenue Increase Discussion

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai

May.21.2024

Brazil's E-Cigarette Ban Potential Tax Revenue Increase Discussion

Brazilian e-cigarette ban may increase government tax revenue by $660 million annually, sparking debate in a public hearing on legislation.

According to a report by Poder360 on May 20, the e-cigarette ban in Brazil may result in the government's annual import tax revenue increasing by 3.4 billion reais (6.6 billion US dollars). These figures come from a study commissioned by British American Tobacco by the Federation of Industries of Minas Gerais (Fiemg) in Brazil.

The National Health Surveillance Agency of Brazil (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária) previously banned the production, sale, distribution, storage, transportation, and promotion of e-cigarette devices domestically. However, according to a survey by the Brazilian polling agency Ipec in 2023, there are still approximately 2.9 million users nationwide. The agency stated that, based on the number of users, if the domestic tobacco industry were to take over production and distribution to meet Brazil's demand, it could create 124,500 new formal and informal jobs, with the tobacco cultivation industry alone providing 12,950 jobs.

This material is based on a potential demand estimated by the latest survey by Ipec for 3.5 million Brazilian consumers per year, which would represent a market of 10.5 billion reais (2.05 billion dollars) per year.

On the afternoon of May 21, Brazil will hold a joint public hearing to discuss a bill (PL 5.008/2023) regarding the production, import, export, sale, control, supervision, and promotion of e-cigarettes.

References:

[1] Governo pode arrecadar R$ 3,4 bi ao regulamentar vapes, diz Fiemg

Also Read:

[1] Brazil to Host Joint Public Hearing on E-cigarette Legislation

[2] Brazil Implements Ban on E-cigarettes and Offers Free Treatment

[3] Health Risks of E-Cigarettes: Warning from Parana State Authorities

[4] Brazilian Senator Soraya Thronicke Opposes Anvisa's E-Cigarette Ban

[5] Brazil Bans E-cigarette Devices in Effort to Protect Public Health

[6] Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency Maintains Ban on E-Cigarettes

[7] Brazil to Review Vape Sales Ban Again

[8] Brazilian Health Authority Delays Debate on E-cigarette Regulations to the 19th

[9] Brazil Considers Ban on E-cigarettes: Anvisa Decision Coming Soon

#Legislation #E-cigarettes #South America #Brazil

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn

Notice

1. This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2. The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3. This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4. Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

Copyright

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

AI Assistance Disclaimer

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Product | Up to 100,000 Puffs and Over 2,000 Puffs per ml: MASKKING, MR FOG, HYPERBAR Roll Out Ultra High-Puff New Devices

In 2025, disposable vapes are shifting from a “puff count race” to a focus on user experience. While 30,000–50,000 puffs has become mainstream, brands like MASKKING, MR FOG, and HYPERBAR are still launching higher-capacity products in the 60,000–100,000 puff range. Models with disclosed tank sizes all exceed 2,000 puffs per mL and commonly feature adjustable wattage and enhanced interactive functions.

Nov.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai

Russia's Perm Legislators Approve Full Ban on Vape Products in Regional Retail Market

2Firsts, November 28, 2025 — The Legislative Assembly of Perm Krai has passed a law banning the retail sale of vape products and other nicotine-aerosol devices, effective March 1, 2026. Individuals found selling such items will face fines between ₽15,000–₽20,000 (about US $180–240), while companies face ₽50,000–₽100,000 (about US $600–1,200). The ban covers all electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), heated-tobacco devices, and their components, regardless of nicotine content.

Nov.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai

2Firsts Breaking | FDA to Hold PMTA Roundtable for Small ENDS Manufacturers, Spotlighting Small Business Applications

The FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) will hold a PMTA roundtable on February 10, 2026, for small electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) manufacturers, seeking input on PMTA submission experiences and recommendations for streamlining and improving the review process.

Dec.24

EUIPO Rejects Imiracle’s Opposition to ‘Crystal’ Trademark, Citing Lack of Proof of Actual Use in Slovakia

The EUIPO has ruled that Imiracle failed to demonstrate actual commercial use of its “Elfbar Crystal” brand in Slovakia, and therefore rejected in full the company’s opposition to Shenzhen SKE Technology’s application to register the “Crystal” trademark. The EUIPO noted that the sales records submitted by Imiracle were limited in scope and that the product packaging was in Ukrainian, which it found insufficient to prove that the products had been placed on the Slovak market.