India Urged to Ban Smoking Zones in Hotels, Restaurants, Airports

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai

Mar.14.2024

India Urged to Ban Smoking Zones in Hotels, Restaurants, Airports

Doctors, cancer patients, and hotels are urging the Indian government to ban designated smoking areas in public places.

According to a report by telegraphindia, doctors, cancer patients, and hotels are urging the Indian government to ban designated smoking rooms in hotels, restaurants, and airports in order to protect the public from secondhand smoke.

Dr. Harit Chaturvedi, Chair of Cancer Care at Kesar Medical Center, stated: "Smoking exacerbates lung function impairment and lowers immunity. All designated smoking areas in hotels, restaurants, and even airports should be abolished to ensure a completely smoke-free environment. Most designated smoking areas rarely meet the requirements of COTPA, exposing our public to significant health risks due to secondhand smoke inhalation."

According to the 2003 Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA), smoking is prohibited in all public places. However, smoking is still allowed in designated smoking areas in some public places such as restaurants, hotels, and airports.

Health activity expert Nalini Satyanarayan stated, "Passive smoking mostly occurs in restaurants, especially in hotels, eateries, bars, clubs, etc. Cigarette smoke can permeate from smoking zones into public areas. The COTPA needs to be amended to prohibit smoking in any location, as this aligns with the best interests of public health."

Currently, the Indian government has initiated the process of amending COTPA and has introduced the 2020 Amendment to the Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade, Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act.

References:

[1] No Smoking Day: Government urged to remove designated rooms in hotels, airports

Also Read:

[1] Illegal E-cigarette Sales Crackdown in Indian Market: 6 Arrested

[2] Indian Association Supports Government Efforts to Combat Illegal Vapes

[3] China's E-cigarette Export Data to Indonesia in December 2023

[4] BAT Considering Sale of Partial Stake in Indian ITC Company

[5] Disappointment over India's Decision on Tobacco Tax in 2024-25 Budget

[6] India Strengthens Regulation on Tobacco Product Manufacturers in 2024 Finance Bill

[7] Experts Call for Stronger Tobacco Advertising Regulations in Indonesia

#Legislation #Asia #India #Tobacco

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn

Notice

1. This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2. The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3. This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4. Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

Copyright

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

AI Assistance Disclaimer

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

COP11 Concludes with Major Decisions on Global Tobacco Control

The Eleventh Session of the Conference of the Parties (COP11) to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) concluded in Geneva on November 22, with 160 Parties adopting major decisions on tobacco and nicotine regulation, environmental protection, sustainable financing, and tobacco industry liability. A landmark decision mandates a complete ban on the use and sale of tobacco and all novel nicotine products across all UN premises worldwide.

Nov.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai

Scottish Retailers Urge Government to Fast-Track Nicotine Pouch Regulations

The Scottish Grocers’ Federation (SGF) is calling on the government to clarify the regulatory framework for nicotine pouches in order to prevent high-strength and illegal products from entering the market, stressing that these products should not be targeted at minors.

Dec.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai

U.S. vape firms appeal Mississippi synthetic-nicotine ban, citing FDA authority preemption

A coalition of U.S. vape industry groups has appealed a Mississippi law banning the sale of e-cigarette products containing synthetic nicotine, arguing the statute effectively conditions sales on FDA authorization and unlawfully encroaches on federal regulatory authority. The law took effect in July 2025 and has already begun to be enforced.

Dec.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai

EUIPO Rejects Imiracle’s Opposition to ‘Crystal’ Trademark, Citing Lack of Proof of Actual Use in Slovakia

The EUIPO has ruled that Imiracle failed to demonstrate actual commercial use of its “Elfbar Crystal” brand in Slovakia, and therefore rejected in full the company’s opposition to Shenzhen SKE Technology’s application to register the “Crystal” trademark. The EUIPO noted that the sales records submitted by Imiracle were limited in scope and that the product packaging was in Ukrainian, which it found insufficient to prove that the products had been placed on the Slovak market.