JTI Study: Nearly Half of British People are Aware of Illegal E-Cig Sale

Industry Insight by 2FIRSTS.ai
Feb.27.2024
JTI Study: Nearly Half of British People are Aware of Illegal E-Cig Sale
JTI study reveals high percentage of UK residents aware of illegal tobacco and e-cigarette sales, calling for stricter measures.

According to a report from the Bucksherald, a new study released by Japan Tobacco International (JTI) reveals that nearly half of British people are aware of illegal businesses selling smuggled tobacco (47%) and e-cigarettes (43%). The majority of British people (72%) believe that the cost of living crisis is causing smokers or vapers to seek cheaper illegal alternatives, leading to a vicious cycle that fuels organized crime and impacts local communities.

 

Another survey conducted by JTI showed that more than two-thirds of convenience stores (67%) also believe that the proposed intergenerational tobacco ban could lead to an increase in illicit tobacco activities, and are concerned that illegal products will become more prevalent.

 

According to the study, the research team has traveled to certain regions to conduct on-site investigations into the issue of illegal tobacco and e-cigarette sales. The results of the investigation revealed the extent of illegal tobacco sales in the UK, with West Yorkshire specifically experiencing a significant problem with illegal sales.

 

Regarding the public's perception of the organized crime risks that illegal tobacco and e-cigarette sales may pose to their local communities, nearly half of respondents (46%) believe the risks are "high" (29%) or "very high" (17%).

 

Popular measures to combat the illegal sale and distribution of tobacco and e-cigarettes include increasing fines for violators (59%), automatically revoking store licenses (also 59%), and automatically shutting down stores (44%).

 

Sarah Connor, director of communications for JTI UK, commented: "The illegal sale of tobacco and e-cigarettes is a major issue, causing significant negative impacts on communities. With tightening budgets for most people, and increasing taxes on legal tobacco and e-cigarette products, it is not surprising that more and more consumers are turning to illegal products as a cheaper alternative."

 

The company is calling for stronger cooperation between the government and the tobacco industry to prevent the sale of illicit tobacco and e-cigarettes.

 

According to a recent JTI survey conducted earlier this year in 2024, more than a quarter of retailers (28%) reported an increase in customers openly seeking illegal tobacco and e-cigarette products, while a quarter of retailers (26%) stated that their businesses have been negatively impacted due to other businesses in the community selling illegal tobacco and e-cigarettes.

 

Retailers believe that the main reason why 76% of retailers sell illegal tobacco or e-cigarette products is to boost sales, while customers are increasingly likely to purchase these illicit products because they are cheaper than legal alternatives.

 

Despite these findings, it is surprising that 95% of retailers reported that they have never reported a merchant selling illegal tobacco or e-cigarette products to the trade standards bureau.

 

Harsh punishments and fines, more frequent inspections from the trade standards agency, and stronger border controls to reduce the influx of illegal products into the UK are the most commonly cited solutions by retailers when discussing the support needed to address the issue of illegal tobacco.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has revised the rules under Import Alert 98-07 to incorporate its May 2026 enforcement-priority policy for certain electronic nicotine delivery systems marketed without premarket authorization. The alert continues to allow detention without physical examination, or DWPE, for ENDS lacking required marketing authorization, while directing field divisions to apply the May risk-based framework. When necessary, detention or refusal decisions must also undergo review by the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products. Products including PACHA and Vuse Pro have already emerged as industry examples of the May policy, although enforcement discretion does not constitute FDA marketing authorization.
News
Sep.28 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Texas Extends Tobacco Tax Interpretation to a 6-Methylnicotine Product, Citing VELO Ruling
Texas Extends Tobacco Tax Interpretation to a 6-Methylnicotine Product, Citing VELO Ruling
The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts ruled in September 2026 that a combustible product made with non-tobacco plant material and 6-methylnicotine (6-MN), a synthetic nicotine analog, qualifies as a taxable tobacco product. The applicant said the product contained neither tobacco leaf nor measurable conventional nicotine. The determination applies reasoning from a May Texas Supreme Court decision involving VELO nicotine pouches, finding that the plant material and 6-MN together perform the functions of tobacco in a conventional smoking product. The ruling carries applicable tax, licensing and reporting obligations but is limited to the facts submitted by the taxpayer. It does not establish a blanket tax classification for all 6-MN products or extend the same conclusion to e-cigarettes.
Regulations
Nov.06
U.S. Health Groups Seek to Overturn FDA Enforcement Discretion for Pending PMTAs as Altria's Helix, NJOY and AVM Move to Intervene
U.S. Health Groups Seek to Overturn FDA Enforcement Discretion for Pending PMTAs as Altria's Helix, NJOY and AVM Move to Intervene
American Vapor Manufacturers (AVM) and Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY filed separate motions on October 7, 2026, seeking to intervene on the FDA's side in a lawsuit challenging its enforcement guidance for certain e-cigarette and nicotine pouch products with pending premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs). Seven public health and tobacco-control organizations, including the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, sued the agency in July to overturn the policy. AVM argues that vacating the guidance could disrupt orders, inventory, retail distribution and investments in regulatory submissions.
Regulations
Oct.09
2Firsts Interview | Cigarette Sales Fall as Smokeless Alternatives Gain in U.S. Convenience Stores, NACS Says
2Firsts Interview | Cigarette Sales Fall as Smokeless Alternatives Gain in U.S. Convenience Stores, NACS Says
Ahead of the 2026 NACS Show, 2Firsts interviewed Chris Rapanick, NACS managing director of research, on changes reshaping the U.S. convenience-store tobacco and nicotine market. NACS data show cigarette sales declining while smokeless alternatives, including nicotine pouches, continue to grow. The interview also examines higher OTP margins, shifting backbar space, weaker store traffic, regulatory uncertainty and NACS’ outlook for 2027, offering a retailer-side view of one of the world’s largest nicotine markets.
Interview
Oct.03
From Vuse, Velo and glo to AI Consulting: Former BAT Content Lead Launches Destreza
From Vuse, Velo and glo to AI Consulting: Former BAT Content Lead Launches Destreza
Former BAT global content lead Andy Parton has left the company and launched Destreza, a London-based AI-native marketing consultancy. Parton previously worked across BAT's New Category brands Vuse, Velo and glo and had also served as Global Brand Lead for Vuse Go. Destreza says it will advise consumer businesses on AI in brand strategy, operating models, capability and agency configuration, using specialist AI agents to support research, strategy and creative development. BAT reported £3.621 billion in New Category revenue in 2025.
Sep.22
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration published a final decision on September 25 to classify 6-methylnicotine as a Schedule 9 prohibited substance under the Poisons Standard, effective October 1, 2026. TGA said the chemical has been reported in e-cigarette liquids sold in Australia and marketed as nicotine-free or nicotine alternatives, while evidence also indicates its use in preparations such as oral pouches. The government originally proposed a Schedule 7 classification but ultimately adopted the stricter Schedule 9 designation, citing acute toxicity, dependence risk, use in unapproved consumer products and misleading marketing.
News
Sep.29 by 2Firsts Perspectives