Notice of Public Consultation on Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau (Draft)

Jan.14.2025
Notice of Public Consultation on Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau (Draft)
Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau solicits public opinion on administrative punishment regulations, receiving 2 suggestions and making amendments.

On December 18, 2024, the Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau announced on its government website the solicitation of opinions on the "Implementation Measures for Administrative Penalty Discretion of the Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau (Draft for Soliciting Opinions)." The announcement openly requested suggestions from the public, and a total of 2 opinions were received within the specified deadline. After carefully analyzing and studying each opinion, the bureau will now explain the adopted opinions as follows:


Regarding Article 22, some opinions suggest that administrative penalties that are currently undergoing administrative reconsideration or administrative litigation, or have already been decided upon by the reconsideration authority or court, should not be ordered to be corrected. Therefore, the phrase "should be ordered to correct" in Article 22 of the draft for comments should be modified to "should be ordered to correct in accordance with the law" in order to guide and supervise the exercise of discretion in administrative penalties by the Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and correct any inappropriate penalty actions that are found.


The opinion is legally valid and reasonable, and will be adopted.


Regarding Appendix 1, some opinions point out that in items 24 to 29 of the "solicitation draft" in Appendix 1, "e-cigarette" is specified under "tobacco," but in items 2 to 13 and 15 to 22, "tobacco" does not specify "e-cigarette." The inconsistency in the text can easily lead to misunderstandings. Also, according to relevant laws, regulations, and normative documents related to e-cigarettes, it is believed that the penalties in Appendix 1 of the "solicitation draft" should include penalties for e-cigarettes.


After conducting research, the opinion was not accepted for the following reasons:


According to Article 17 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Minors, parents or other guardians of minors are not allowed to engage in the following behaviors: (4) Allowing or inciting minors to smoke (including e-cigarettes, the same below), drink alcohol, gamble, beg or bully others. Therefore, Appendix 1 of the draft for soliciting opinions specifically clarifies the scope of "smoking" in items 24 to 29, in order to fully implement the provisions of the Law on the Protection of Minors of the People's Republic of China. In addition, other illegal activities involving e-cigarettes are not the focus of this draft for soliciting opinions.


This is to announce.


Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau


January 14, 2025


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Indiana’s Foreign-Made Vape Ban Takes Effect, Forcing Brands and Retailers to Adjust Supply Chains
Indiana’s Foreign-Made Vape Ban Takes Effect, Forcing Brands and Retailers to Adjust Supply Chains
A new Indiana law restricting the sale of foreign-made vape products has taken effect, requiring retailers to adjust inventory and sourcing practices. According to The Sun, WDRB and other reports, some local vape shops are reviewing product origins and supplier information to comply with the new requirements. The measure represents a broader shift in U.S. vape regulation, with oversight expanding beyond product authorization and sales rules toward manufacturing origin and supply-chain management.
Jul.24
UK Councils Seize More Than 1.3 Million Non-Compliant Vapes One Year After Disposable Ban
UK Councils Seize More Than 1.3 Million Non-Compliant Vapes One Year After Disposable Ban
One year after the UK disposable vape ban came into force, local authorities continue to seize illegal and non-compliant vaping products. FOI data compiled by nicotine retailer Northerner shows more than 1.3 million products were seized between June 2025 and May 2026, with Bolton recording the highest number of seizures and Swansea reporting the highest estimated value.
Jul.21
Product | OLIVEBAR Launches RAZ PRO 85K, Combining Up to 85,000 Puffs With a Transparent Pod Design
Product | OLIVEBAR Launches RAZ PRO 85K, Combining Up to 85,000 Puffs With a Transparent Pod Design
OLIVEBAR has introduced the RAZ PRO 85K disposable vape, featuring up to 85,000 puffs, a transparent e-liquid pod, and a Mega HD display. As competition in the ultra-high-puff disposable segment continues to intensify, the new device reflects an industry shift from simply increasing puff counts toward enhancing visual interaction and user experience.
Jul.03
China’s Shanghai Tobacco Group Launches CNY 10.98 Million (Approximately US$1.53 Million) Procurement for Heated Tobacco Production Utility Equipment
China’s Shanghai Tobacco Group Launches CNY 10.98 Million (Approximately US$1.53 Million) Procurement for Heated Tobacco Production Utility Equipment
Shanghai Tobacco Group Co., Ltd., a tobacco manufacturing company under China National Tobacco Corporation (CNTC), has launched a public tender for heated tobacco products (HTPs) production utility equipment at its Shanghai Cigarette Factory. The project is valued at CNY 10.98 million and covers six combined air-conditioning units, electrical cabinets and control systems for production facilities. The procurement includes equipment design, supply, installation, commissioning and related training services.
Aug.07
AHA Journal Study: WS-23 Triples Premature Heartbeats, Raising Concerns Over Vape Cooling Agents
AHA Journal Study: WS-23 Triples Premature Heartbeats, Raising Concerns Over Vape Cooling Agents
A University of Louisville research team published a study in an American Heart Association journal suggesting that synthetic cooling agents used in e-cigarettes, including WS-3 and WS-23, may disrupt cardiac electrical activity and increase arrhythmia risk. In animal experiments, WS-23 tripled premature heartbeats.
Jun.16
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06