Notice of Public Consultation on Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau (Draft)

Jan.14
Notice of Public Consultation on Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau (Draft)
Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau solicits public opinion on administrative punishment regulations, receiving 2 suggestions and making amendments.

On December 18, 2024, the Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau announced on its government website the solicitation of opinions on the "Implementation Measures for Administrative Penalty Discretion of the Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau (Draft for Soliciting Opinions)." The announcement openly requested suggestions from the public, and a total of 2 opinions were received within the specified deadline. After carefully analyzing and studying each opinion, the bureau will now explain the adopted opinions as follows:


Regarding Article 22, some opinions suggest that administrative penalties that are currently undergoing administrative reconsideration or administrative litigation, or have already been decided upon by the reconsideration authority or court, should not be ordered to be corrected. Therefore, the phrase "should be ordered to correct" in Article 22 of the draft for comments should be modified to "should be ordered to correct in accordance with the law" in order to guide and supervise the exercise of discretion in administrative penalties by the Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and correct any inappropriate penalty actions that are found.


The opinion is legally valid and reasonable, and will be adopted.


Regarding Appendix 1, some opinions point out that in items 24 to 29 of the "solicitation draft" in Appendix 1, "e-cigarette" is specified under "tobacco," but in items 2 to 13 and 15 to 22, "tobacco" does not specify "e-cigarette." The inconsistency in the text can easily lead to misunderstandings. Also, according to relevant laws, regulations, and normative documents related to e-cigarettes, it is believed that the penalties in Appendix 1 of the "solicitation draft" should include penalties for e-cigarettes.


After conducting research, the opinion was not accepted for the following reasons:


According to Article 17 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Minors, parents or other guardians of minors are not allowed to engage in the following behaviors: (4) Allowing or inciting minors to smoke (including e-cigarettes, the same below), drink alcohol, gamble, beg or bully others. Therefore, Appendix 1 of the draft for soliciting opinions specifically clarifies the scope of "smoking" in items 24 to 29, in order to fully implement the provisions of the Law on the Protection of Minors of the People's Republic of China. In addition, other illegal activities involving e-cigarettes are not the focus of this draft for soliciting opinions.


This is to announce.


Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau


January 14, 2025


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Belarus Increases e-cigarette tax by 20% and Reinstates Tax on heated tobacco
Belarus Increases e-cigarette tax by 20% and Reinstates Tax on heated tobacco
Belarus government plans to raise tobacco tax by 12% and e-cigarette tax by 20%, aiming to regulate all smoking devices.
Oct.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Lawmakers Push to Include E-Cigarettes in Vietnam’s Revised Investment Law Ban
Lawmakers Push to Include E-Cigarettes in Vietnam’s Revised Investment Law Ban
Vietnam’s National Assembly has debated amendments to the Investment Law that would include e-cigarettes, heated tobacco, and nitrous oxide (N₂O) in the list of prohibited business activities. Lawmakers supported a total ban consistent with WHO recommendations and previous National Assembly resolutions, citing rising youth addiction rates. Finance Minister Nguyễn Văn Thắng confirmed that the ban would apply comprehensively, with a short transition period for foreign factories.
Nov.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
5th Circuit Reviews FDA’s Compliance on Small-Business Impact of Vape Rule
5th Circuit Reviews FDA’s Compliance on Small-Business Impact of Vape Rule
A Fifth Circuit panel expressed doubts about whether the U.S. Food and Drug Administration complied with the Regulatory Flexibility Act when issuing its 2021 final rule on premarket tobacco product applications. Vape companies argued the FDA relied on outdated and inaccurate economic data, while the government said the challenged requirements stem from the Tobacco Control Act.
Dec.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Special Report|With Charlie’s US Line Online, the US-Filled Vape Supply Chain Model Enters a New Phase
Special Report|With Charlie’s US Line Online, the US-Filled Vape Supply Chain Model Enters a New Phase
Charlie’s Holdings has activated its first US-based manufacturing and filling line, enabling the company’s Pachamama 25K vape series to meet Texas’ new domestic manufacturing requirements. As state-level rules tighten, the move signals a broader industry shift toward US-filled supply chains and marks an inflection point for brands historically reliant on China-based prefilled production.
Industry Insight
Dec.02
PMI Launches VEEV E-Cigarette in South Africa, Expanding Access to Smoke-Free Alternatives
PMI Launches VEEV E-Cigarette in South Africa, Expanding Access to Smoke-Free Alternatives
Philip Morris International's South Africa branch launches e-cigarette product Veev, making South Africa one of 20 countries with PMI's smoke-free products.
Oct.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Hounslow Crackdown Seizes £33,000 of Illegal Vapes and Combustible Cigarettes
Hounslow Crackdown Seizes £33,000 of Illegal Vapes and Combustible Cigarettes
Hounslow Council’s Trading Standards team, working with Metropolitan Police units, conducted test purchases across the borough and found seven premises selling illegal tobacco. Subsequent raids at 16 premises in Chiswick, Feltham and Hounslow High Street seized 4,859 illegal vapes (≈£30,000), 3,806 combustible cigarettes (≈£3,000), 16kg of shisha and 11kg of chewing tobacco. Offences included oversized tanks, over-strength nicotine, and unregistered products.
Oct.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai