Notice of Public Consultation on Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau (Draft)

Jan.14
Notice of Public Consultation on Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau (Draft)
Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau solicits public opinion on administrative punishment regulations, receiving 2 suggestions and making amendments.

On December 18, 2024, the Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau announced on its government website the solicitation of opinions on the "Implementation Measures for Administrative Penalty Discretion of the Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau (Draft for Soliciting Opinions)." The announcement openly requested suggestions from the public, and a total of 2 opinions were received within the specified deadline. After carefully analyzing and studying each opinion, the bureau will now explain the adopted opinions as follows:


Regarding Article 22, some opinions suggest that administrative penalties that are currently undergoing administrative reconsideration or administrative litigation, or have already been decided upon by the reconsideration authority or court, should not be ordered to be corrected. Therefore, the phrase "should be ordered to correct" in Article 22 of the draft for comments should be modified to "should be ordered to correct in accordance with the law" in order to guide and supervise the exercise of discretion in administrative penalties by the Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and correct any inappropriate penalty actions that are found.


The opinion is legally valid and reasonable, and will be adopted.


Regarding Appendix 1, some opinions point out that in items 24 to 29 of the "solicitation draft" in Appendix 1, "e-cigarette" is specified under "tobacco," but in items 2 to 13 and 15 to 22, "tobacco" does not specify "e-cigarette." The inconsistency in the text can easily lead to misunderstandings. Also, according to relevant laws, regulations, and normative documents related to e-cigarettes, it is believed that the penalties in Appendix 1 of the "solicitation draft" should include penalties for e-cigarettes.


After conducting research, the opinion was not accepted for the following reasons:


According to Article 17 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Minors, parents or other guardians of minors are not allowed to engage in the following behaviors: (4) Allowing or inciting minors to smoke (including e-cigarettes, the same below), drink alcohol, gamble, beg or bully others. Therefore, Appendix 1 of the draft for soliciting opinions specifically clarifies the scope of "smoking" in items 24 to 29, in order to fully implement the provisions of the Law on the Protection of Minors of the People's Republic of China. In addition, other illegal activities involving e-cigarettes are not the focus of this draft for soliciting opinions.


This is to announce.


Shenzhen Tobacco Monopoly Bureau


January 14, 2025


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

NZ Issues National High Alert on Etomidate-Laced Vapes After Hospitalisations
NZ Issues National High Alert on Etomidate-Laced Vapes After Hospitalisations
New Zealand’s High Alert drug harm monitoring system has issued a public High Alert warning after multiple hospitalisations linked to illicit vape pods containing the anaesthetic etomidate. Known on the street as space oil, k-pods, or eto, these vapes were first detected in January 2025. Customs has since seized additional samples, and clinics nationwide report rising cases of poisoning and hypoglycaemia.
Nov.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Hounslow Crackdown Seizes £33,000 of Illegal Vapes and Combustible Cigarettes
Hounslow Crackdown Seizes £33,000 of Illegal Vapes and Combustible Cigarettes
Hounslow Council’s Trading Standards team, working with Metropolitan Police units, conducted test purchases across the borough and found seven premises selling illegal tobacco. Subsequent raids at 16 premises in Chiswick, Feltham and Hounslow High Street seized 4,859 illegal vapes (≈£30,000), 3,806 combustible cigarettes (≈£3,000), 16kg of shisha and 11kg of chewing tobacco. Offences included oversized tanks, over-strength nicotine, and unregistered products.
Oct.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Judge Dismisses Some Claims in Arkansas THC Vape Class Action
Judge Dismisses Some Claims in Arkansas THC Vape Class Action
U.S. District Judge Brian S. Miller has dismissed some claims from a proposed class action alleging that vape products contained THC levels above legal limits, while allowing others to proceed. The court rejected warranty and drug liability claims but upheld RICO, negligence, and fraud allegations against multiple defendants.
Nov.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Chonburi Police Raid Major E-Cigarette and Vape Liquid Warehouse Worth Over US$920,000
Chonburi Police Raid Major E-Cigarette and Vape Liquid Warehouse Worth Over US$920,000
Thailand Chonburi provincial police, in coordination with multiple agencies, raided a large-scale warehouse in downtown Chonburi used for producing and distributing e-cigarettes and vape liquids. Two Chinese nationals were arrested, and more than 40 categories of contraband—including vapes, e-liquids, and production equipment—were seized, with an estimated total value exceeding US$920,000 (about 30 million Thai baht).
Nov.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
69% of Russians Support Full Ban on E-Cigarette Sales, SuperJob Survey Shows
69% of Russians Support Full Ban on E-Cigarette Sales, SuperJob Survey Shows
According to Gazeta.Ru, a SuperJob poll found that 69% of Russians support President Vladimir Putin’s decision to fully ban vape sales in Russia. Only 7% oppose the ban, while 15% said they are indifferent and 9% were undecided.
Nov.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Two e-cigarette shops in Franklin, USA under investigation for selling THC products to minors, seized 150 pounds of raw materials and cash
Two e-cigarette shops in Franklin, USA under investigation for selling THC products to minors, seized 150 pounds of raw materials and cash
Two e-cigarette shops in Franklin, USA, under investigation for selling THC products and illegal cash transactions to minors.
Sep.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai