PMI and BAT Resolve Intellectual Property Dispute

BATPMI by 2FIRSTS.ai
Feb.03.2024
PMI and BAT Resolve Intellectual Property Dispute
Philip Morris International (PMI) and British American Tobacco (BAT) have resolved their intellectual property dispute over heated tobacco and e-cigarette products.

On February 2nd, in the Eastern Time Zone of the United States, both Philip Morris International (PMI) and British American Tobacco (BAT) announced on their respective official websites that they have resolved their intellectual property dispute regarding heated tobacco and e-cigarette products.

 

PMI and BAT Resolve Intellectual Property Dispute
PMI Press Release | Image Source: PMI Official Website

 

British American Tobacco (BAT) and Philip Morris International (PMI) have announced a settlement agreement that includes non-monetary terms between the two companies. This agreement resolves all ongoing global patent infringement lawsuits, including any related injunctions and exclusions, and prevents future claims against current heated tobacco and vaping products. The settlement also allows both parties to continue innovating and launching improved versions of their products. Both companies are committed to ongoing innovation in the reduced-risk product space, furthering efforts to reduce the harm caused by tobacco.

 

PMI and BAT Resolve Intellectual Property Dispute
BAT News Just In | Image Source: BAT Official Website.

 

These two international tobacco companies have been embroiled in a multifaceted patent war. BAT's e-cigarette brand VUSE and heat-not-burn tobacco device brand GLO suffered a defeat in one case, being ordered to pay millions of dollars; while PMI was prohibited from introducing its flagship heat-not-burn tobacco device IQOS into the United States due to another lawsuit.

 

PMI CEO, Jacek Olczak, expressed satisfaction with the resolution, stating, "We are pleased that both parties are content with the outcome. Adult smokers worldwide consistently display a desire for a range of smoke-free products, and we believe that continued innovation in reduced-risk alternatives can expedite the reduction of smoking-related harms, benefiting consumers and public health as a whole. Meanwhile, we will remain committed to phasing out the sale of traditional cigarettes as part of PMI's journey.

 

BAT CEO Tadeu Marroco has expressed his satisfaction with the recent agreement, stating, "This agreement is a significant step forward for BAT and all our stakeholders. With the successful development of our billion-pound brands VUSE and GLO, the potential for reducing tobacco harm is evident. I am pleased that this settlement will allow BAT to focus on developing innovative solutions to provide adult consumers with reduced-risk products and contribute to our 'A Better Tomorrow' mission. By doing so, we will help build a smoke-free world for consumers, investors, and society as a whole."

 

2FIRSTS has invited Chinese e-cigarette legal expert Counsellor Tang Shunliang to provide a professional analysis of the background and potential impact of the patent settlement between PMI and BAT. An article providing this analysis will be published later. Stay tuned.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Russia Proposes Mandatory Labelling of E-cigarettes from April 1, 2026
Russia Proposes Mandatory Labelling of E-cigarettes from April 1, 2026
Russia’s Ministry of Industry and Trade has proposed introducing mandatory labelling for electronic cigarettes and other electronic devices used to consume nicotine, starting April 1, 2026. The draft resolution has been published on the regulatory portal. Under the proposal, market participants would be required to register with the national monitoring system and label products accordingly, as part of efforts to enhance state oversight of production and circulation.
Dec.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Irish Cabinet to Consider Bill Banning Sale of Single-Use Vapes
Irish Cabinet to Consider Bill Banning Sale of Single-Use Vapes
Ireland’s Minister for Health, Jennifer Carroll MacNeill, will seek Cabinet approval today for the publication of the Public Health (Single-Use Vapes) Bill 2025, which proposes banning the retail sale of single-use or disposable vapes six months after becoming law. The measure aims to address the growing use of disposable vapes, particularly among young people, and close regulatory gaps around emerging nicotine products such as pouches.
Nov.18 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Vietnam’s Health Ministry consults on tobacco-control law amendments, proposing an e-cigarette ban
Vietnam’s Health Ministry consults on tobacco-control law amendments, proposing an e-cigarette ban
VTV.vn reports that Vietnam’s Ministry of Health is collecting feedback on a draft amendment to the Law on Prevention and Control of Tobacco Harms, proposing an e-cigarette ban and broader public health protections.
Jan.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
EU to Abstain from WHO Tobacco Treaty Vote Amid Deep Internal Split
EU to Abstain from WHO Tobacco Treaty Vote Amid Deep Internal Split
The European Union will abstain from voting at the upcoming 11th session of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (COP11) in Geneva, following months of internal disagreement over how to regulate tobacco and nicotine products. The decision marks a rare and public fracture in EU health policy, reportedly driven by the European Commission’s hardline anti-tobacco stance.
Nov.18 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Singapore’s Underground Vape Chain Revealed:How Dispatchers, Telegram Groups, and Small “Online Shops” Form an Operating Model
Singapore’s Underground Vape Chain Revealed:How Dispatchers, Telegram Groups, and Small “Online Shops” Form an Operating Model
A vape-related case reported by The Straits Times illustrates the typical operating methods of Singapore’s underground vape trade, including Telegram-based “online shops,” centrally coordinated scheduling, and small-volume, fragmented deliveries. The case highlights the segmented and concealed nature of the country’s black-market vape network. Drawing on the report, 2Firsts uses this case as a sample to map out the structure and operational patterns of Singapore’s underground vape chain.
Dec.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
A filing in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond Division) shows NJOY and Altria entities submitted a plaintiffs’ reply supporting their motion for summary judgment, arguing the challenged ITC proceeding is unconstitutional on multiple grounds, including ALJ appointment authority, removal protections, and Article III limits under the Jarkesy framework. The plaintiffs seek summary judgment and a permanent injunction barring continuation of the ITC proceeding.
Jan.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai