PMI and BAT Resolve Intellectual Property Dispute

BATPMI by 2FIRSTS.ai
Feb.03.2024
PMI and BAT Resolve Intellectual Property Dispute
Philip Morris International (PMI) and British American Tobacco (BAT) have resolved their intellectual property dispute over heated tobacco and e-cigarette products.

On February 2nd, in the Eastern Time Zone of the United States, both Philip Morris International (PMI) and British American Tobacco (BAT) announced on their respective official websites that they have resolved their intellectual property dispute regarding heated tobacco and e-cigarette products.

 

PMI and BAT Resolve Intellectual Property Dispute
PMI Press Release | Image Source: PMI Official Website

 

British American Tobacco (BAT) and Philip Morris International (PMI) have announced a settlement agreement that includes non-monetary terms between the two companies. This agreement resolves all ongoing global patent infringement lawsuits, including any related injunctions and exclusions, and prevents future claims against current heated tobacco and vaping products. The settlement also allows both parties to continue innovating and launching improved versions of their products. Both companies are committed to ongoing innovation in the reduced-risk product space, furthering efforts to reduce the harm caused by tobacco.

 

PMI and BAT Resolve Intellectual Property Dispute
BAT News Just In | Image Source: BAT Official Website.

 

These two international tobacco companies have been embroiled in a multifaceted patent war. BAT's e-cigarette brand VUSE and heat-not-burn tobacco device brand GLO suffered a defeat in one case, being ordered to pay millions of dollars; while PMI was prohibited from introducing its flagship heat-not-burn tobacco device IQOS into the United States due to another lawsuit.

 

PMI CEO, Jacek Olczak, expressed satisfaction with the resolution, stating, "We are pleased that both parties are content with the outcome. Adult smokers worldwide consistently display a desire for a range of smoke-free products, and we believe that continued innovation in reduced-risk alternatives can expedite the reduction of smoking-related harms, benefiting consumers and public health as a whole. Meanwhile, we will remain committed to phasing out the sale of traditional cigarettes as part of PMI's journey.

 

BAT CEO Tadeu Marroco has expressed his satisfaction with the recent agreement, stating, "This agreement is a significant step forward for BAT and all our stakeholders. With the successful development of our billion-pound brands VUSE and GLO, the potential for reducing tobacco harm is evident. I am pleased that this settlement will allow BAT to focus on developing innovative solutions to provide adult consumers with reduced-risk products and contribute to our 'A Better Tomorrow' mission. By doing so, we will help build a smoke-free world for consumers, investors, and society as a whole."

 

2FIRSTS has invited Chinese e-cigarette legal expert Counsellor Tang Shunliang to provide a professional analysis of the background and potential impact of the patent settlement between PMI and BAT. An article providing this analysis will be published later. Stay tuned.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Small ENDS Manufacturers Press FDA on Abuse Liability Standards as Agency Defines Pharmacological Review Framework
Small ENDS Manufacturers Press FDA on Abuse Liability Standards as Agency Defines Pharmacological Review Framework
At the third session of its PMTA roundtable, the FDA outlined its framework for assessing abuse liability in ENDS products, emphasizing the role of nicotine pharmacokinetics and product-specific data in APPH determinations. Small manufacturers questioned the high cost of clinical PK studies and the absence of defined numeric thresholds, while raising bridging strategies and PBPK modeling as potential alternatives.
Feb.11
Jordan Cuts Taxes on Heated Tobacco and E-cigarettes
Jordan Cuts Taxes on Heated Tobacco and E-cigarettes
Jordan has amended its 2025 Special Tax Law, introducing a package of tax reductions on heated tobacco products and electronic cigarettes. Published in the Official Gazette, the changes take effect Monday morning and include a 50% cut in taxes on heated tobacco devices, as well as significant reductions on e-cigarette hardware and liquids. The move is expected to have an immediate impact on retail prices.
Dec.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Brazil’s MPF and Anvisa sign pact to intensify enforcement against vapes
Brazil’s MPF and Anvisa sign pact to intensify enforcement against vapes
Brazil’s Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office (MPF) and health regulator Anvisa signed a cooperation protocol to strengthen enforcement against electronic smoking devices (DEFs) and expand health-risk awareness campaigns.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Imperial Brands’ blu adds “Creamy Tobacco” flavour, rolling out across device kits and pod products
Imperial Brands’ blu adds “Creamy Tobacco” flavour, rolling out across device kits and pod products
Imperial Brands’ vaping brand blu has outlined its flavour roadmap for 2026 on its official website, adding a new “Creamy Tobacco” flavour that has been rolled out across the rechargeable blu bar kit and its compatible blu kit pods. The brand describes the flavour as offering a more velvety tobacco taste.
Dec.19
Kansas Lawmakers Hear SB 355 to License E-Cigarette Makers, Citing Illicit China Imports
Kansas Lawmakers Hear SB 355 to License E-Cigarette Makers, Citing Illicit China Imports
Kansas lawmakers held a Senate committee hearing on Senate Bill 355 on Jan. 27. The proposal would require e-cigarette manufacturers—potentially affecting distributors as well—to obtain a state license, expanding oversight beyond retailers.
Jan.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Interpreting FDA’s on! PLUS Authorization: What the Agency’s Press Release Reveals About Its Nicotine Pouch Review Model
Interpreting FDA’s on! PLUS Authorization: What the Agency’s Press Release Reveals About Its Nicotine Pouch Review Model
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has confirmed that six on! PLUS nicotine pouch products have received Marketing Granted Orders (MGO) through the PMTA pathway. The authorizations were completed under the agency’s nicotine pouch review pilot program in “record time,” with the FDA citing lower levels of harmful constituents while stressing that the decision applies only to the specified products and does not mean they are safe or FDA approved.
Regulations
Dec.20