Revised Regulations on Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Vaping Products

Sep.30.2024
Revised Regulations on Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Vaping Products
DTI revises regulations on e-cigarettes and non-nicotine products, setting max nicotine content and online sales guidelines.

On September 30th, the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) of the Philippines announced on its official website the implementation guidelines for Republic Act 11900 (RA11900), also known as the "Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act." The document specifies that the maximum nicotine content in vapor products should not exceed 65mg/ml, and the DTI, along with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), will collaborate on setting technical standards for vaporized nicotine and non-nicotine products.


The revised content is as follows:


Product standards:


According to Section 18 of RA11900, the Office for Special Tasks on Vaping Products containing Nicotine and Non-Nicotine (OSMV) will work together with the Philippines FDA to formulate and release technical standards for products to ensure their compliance and safety. Vaping products with a nicotine content exceeding 65mg/ml are not allowed to be sold in the market. Compliance with these product standards is mandatory.


Product registration:


According to Article 19 of RA11900, all vapor products and novel tobacco products must be sold online through sellers or distributors registered with the DTI or Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to be sold through the internet or ecommerce platforms. Products sold and advertised online must comply with health warning requirements and other requirements of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR), including tax stamps, minimum or floor prices, or other fiscal markings.


Online sales:


E-commerce platforms and social media sales facilities are only allowed to sell vaporized nicotine and non-nicotine products, their equipment, and novel tobacco products by distributors or retailers registered with the DTI and BIR.


Restrictions on sales and promotions around the school.


It is prohibited to sell, promote, advertise, or display vaporized nicotine and non-nicotine products or new tobacco products within 100 meters of schools.


Designated Smoking Area (DVA) standards:


The standard for the installation of a DVA has been established, requiring individuals or entities looking to install indoor DVAs in buildings and/or locations to first obtain approval from the OSMV.


Illegal products recalled, banned, or confiscated: OSMV can order the recall, prohibit, or seize from public sale or distribution any mist nicotine and non-nicotine products, their equipment, or new tobacco products that do not comply with RA11900, IRR, technical regulations, or their amendment provisions.


Establishment of the Special Task Office:


In order to specifically manage and oversee the taxation of vapor products, DTI has established the "Special Task Office for Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products (OSMV)". This agency will ensure that all vapor products on the market meet technical standards and are effectively taxed.


Online Brand List:


OSMV and BIR will maintain a monthly updated online list, listing brands of atomized nicotine or non-nicotine products, their devices, or new tobacco products eligible for online sale registered by DTI and BIR.


The revision aims to further strengthen the regulation of atomized products, heated tobacco products (HTP), and their equipment, ensuring that these products produced, sold, and distributed in the Philippines market meet international standards, safeguarding public health and safety, and ensuring that the government effectively collects relevant taxes.


The order will take immediate effect after being published in at least two widely circulated newspapers.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Switzerland Tightens Vape Checks as Only 3 of 32 Tested Products Meet New Tobacco Rules
Switzerland Tightens Vape Checks as Only 3 of 32 Tested Products Meet New Tobacco Rules
According to Swiss media outlet Blick, local authorities are strengthening compliance checks on vape products, nicotine pouches and other tobacco-related products following the implementation of Switzerland’s revised Tobacco Products Act. A Basel laboratory tested 32 disposable vapes and e-liquids, with only three meeting regulatory requirements and 21 products banned from sale. Swiss authorities are also expanding retail inspections, laboratory testing and youth purchase checks to enforce the new tobacco and nicotine product rules.
Aug.12
As JUUL2 Wins FDA Authorization, Harm Reduction Journal Highlights the Role of Real-World Evidence in Nicotine Product Regulation
As JUUL2 Wins FDA Authorization, Harm Reduction Journal Highlights the Role of Real-World Evidence in Nicotine Product Regulation
A commentary published in the international open-access, peer-reviewed Harm Reduction Journal argues that randomized controlled trials remain central to evaluating smoking cessation efficacy but cannot alone capture real-world uptake, complete switching, longer-term use and population impact of non-combustible nicotine products such as e-cigarettes, heated tobacco and nicotine pouches. The authors frame impact as “reach × efficacy” and call for real-world evidence to complement RCTs. Three days after publication, the FDA authorized three JUUL2 products and highlighted complete switching among adult smokers in explaining its decision, providing a timely regulatory backdrop to the debate.
Sep.08
China Tobacco Yunnan files patent for cellulose-free nicotine pouch scaffold to replace microcrystalline cellulose
China Tobacco Yunnan files patent for cellulose-free nicotine pouch scaffold to replace microcrystalline cellulose
China Tobacco Yunnan Industrial Co., Ltd. has filed a patent application for a cellulose-free scaffold material for nicotine pouches, proposing a combination of bioceramic material, polydextrose and sugar alcohols to replace conventional microcrystalline cellulose and cellulose derivatives. The filing aims to address issues including powdery mouthfeel, residue and limited release control, while also reducing reliance on existing cellulose-based patent portfolios. In patent examples, one fast-release formulation reached a nicotine release rate of 50% at 10 minutes and more than 90% at 20 minutes.
Sep.02
Product | JT to Launch MEVIUS Tropical Option in Japan, Expanding Ploom Tobacco Stick Lineup to 32
Product | JT to Launch MEVIUS Tropical Option in Japan, Expanding Ploom Tobacco Stick Lineup to 32
Japan Tobacco (JT) will launch MEVIUS Tropical Option, a new tobacco stick for Ploom, nationwide in Japan from October 6, 2026. The capsule-format product combines mango-oriented sweetness with menthol cooling, adding a tropical flavor to the MEVIUS Ploom tobacco-stick lineup for the first time. Each pack contains 20 sticks and will launch at JPY 590. The product is compatible with all Ploom devices, and its addition will expand the Ploom tobacco-stick portfolio to 32 variants.
Sep.08
UK HMRC Issues One-Month Countdown Warning, Urges Vape Businesses to Prepare for New Tax Rules
UK HMRC Issues One-Month Countdown Warning, Urges Vape Businesses to Prepare for New Tax Rules
The UK’s Vaping Products Duty and Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme will take effect on October 1, 2026. All vaping liquids manufactured in or imported into the UK will face a flat excise duty of £2.20 per 10ml, whether or not they contain nicotine. Newly manufactured or imported products released onto the UK market from October 1 will require a valid duty stamp, while eligible existing unstamped inventory can continue to be sold through March 31, 2027. From April 1, 2027, all vaping products outside duty suspension must carry a valid stamp.
Sep.03
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
The UK High Court has ordered Chinese vape manufacturer Shenzhen SKE Technology to provide £569,039 ($776,000) in security for costs in its design infringement proceedings against Vapepen London and other defendants over its Crystal Bar vape product. The court did not accept the defendants’ main argument that recovering costs from a China-based company would face significant enforcement obstacles, but found that SKE had not sufficiently disclosed its own financial position. The order is procedural and does not determine the underlying infringement claims.
News
Aug.21