DTI-FTEB and PNP-CIDG Joint Operation in Tondo District

Sep.10.2024
DTI-FTEB and PNP-CIDG Joint Operation in Tondo District
DTI-FTEB and PNP-CIDG conducted a joint operation in Manila's Tondo district, seizing an e-cigarette store for tax violations.

According to ABS CBN's report on September 9th, the Department of Trade and Industry Fair Trade Enforcement Bureau (DTI-FTEB) and the Philippine National Police Criminal Investigation and Detection Group (PNP-CIDG) conducted a joint operation to raid a store in the Tondo district of Manila. The store was sealed for selling e-cigarette products without internal revenue stamps.


According to a representative from the DTI, despite repeated reminders to comply with tax regulations, the store continued to openly display illegal e-cigarette products. These products, which were showcased, distributed, and sold, did not have the required internal revenue stamps indicating compliance with tax laws.


The authorities have stated that this situation not only deceives small distributors and vendors but also misleads consumers, which is why it is necessary to conduct random raids on all stores.


Law enforcement officials conducted sampling tests on the problematic products and will file lawsuits against the store owner based on Section 22-16, Article 4, Item 2c of the Departmental Administrative Order.


After the incident occurred, the shop owner refused to make any statements to the media regarding the event.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

California: Stiiizy hit with another lawsuit alleging high-THC vapes marketed to teens
California: Stiiizy hit with another lawsuit alleging high-THC vapes marketed to teens
A new lawsuit in California state court accuses Stiiizy Inc. of steering high-THC vape products toward teens through youth-appealing branding and weak age verification, alleging the plaintiff’s underage use was followed by cannabis-induced psychosis-related symptoms and significant personal harm.
Feb.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Kentucky lawmaker proposes directing Juul settlement funds to youth vaping prevention
Kentucky lawmaker proposes directing Juul settlement funds to youth vaping prevention
A Kentucky state senator has filed Senate Bill 74 to steer settlement money the Commonwealth received from vaping manufacturer Juul Labs into youth vaping prevention and cessation efforts.
Jan.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UK vape retailer VPZ to expand manufacturing, open 40 stores in 2026
UK vape retailer VPZ to expand manufacturing, open 40 stores in 2026
UK specialist vape retailer VPZ has launched a multi-million-pound investment programme to boost domestic production capacity and tighten supply-chain controls. The plan includes adding a fifth production line, opening 40 new stores across the UK in 2026 and creating hundreds of jobs, while establishing a bonded warehouse at its Edinburgh headquarters as regulation tightens and a vaping tax is planned.
Feb.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysian Langkawi marine police seize vape devices and e-liquid worth US$43,902
Malaysian Langkawi marine police seize vape devices and e-liquid worth US$43,902
In Langkawi, Malaysia, the Marine Police seized various vape devices and e-liquid valued at RM178,400 (about US$43,902.99). Authorities believe the goods were intended to be smuggled out to a neighboring country.
Jan.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Russia’s St. Petersburg Sets Up Working Group to Consider Citywide Vape Sales Ban
Russia’s St. Petersburg Sets Up Working Group to Consider Citywide Vape Sales Ban
Russia’s St. Petersburg legislature has formed a working group to explore tougher controls on vape trade and sales, including the option of a citywide sales ban. The group is set to convene on Jan. 26 with participation from lawmakers, civil society and law enforcement. The move comes as Russia’s federal authorities continue to debate legislation that could allow regions to impose their own restrictions on vapes.
Jan.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Virginia asks Fourth Circuit to stay order blocking parts of its unauthorized-vape sales law
Virginia asks Fourth Circuit to stay order blocking parts of its unauthorized-vape sales law
Virginia has asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to stay a district court order that blocks enforcement of certain provisions of a state law restricting the sale of unauthorized vaping products. The district court held the law was preempted to the extent it enforced federal requirements under the FDCA and the Tobacco Control Act.
Jan.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai