FDA warns six 'smart e-cigarette' brands, including FUME, Craftbox, and North Vape

Oct.31.2024
FDA warns six 'smart e-cigarette' brands, including FUME, Craftbox, and North Vape
According to 2Firsts' review of the latest FDA warning letters released on October 30, six e-cigarette brands were cited: FUME, Craftbox, North Vape, Posh, Halo Vapor, and Swype.

On October 31, 2Firsts reported that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued warning letters to nine online retailers and one manufacturer, accusing them of selling unauthorized smart e-cigarettes (click to read the article). According to 2Firsts' analysis of the FDA warning letters, six e-cigarette brands were involved: FUME, Craftbox, North Vape, Posh, Halo Vapor, and Swype.

 

2Firsts noted that in the ten FDA warning letters, the agency described how "these products' labels or advertising may appeal to youth by imitating smartphones or other smart technologies" and "may attract teenagers by resembling gaming products," labeling these products as "highly concerning".

 

FDA warns six 'smart e-cigarette' brands, including FUME, Craftbox, and North Vape
FDA issues warning letter|Image source: FDA

 

Below is a list compiled by 2Firsts from the FDA warning letters, detailing the brands and products mentioned:

 

 

FUME

 

 
The product cited in the warning letter is:

 

  •  WeFume Vape 30K Puffs  – cited 3 times

 

FDA warns six 'smart e-cigarette' brands, including FUME, Craftbox, and North Vape
Translation: WeFume Vape 30K Puffs | Image Source: Fume

 

 

Craftbox

 


The products mentioned in the warning letters are:

 

  • Craftbox V-Touch 30k Puff Smart Disposable Vape – cited 4 times  
  • Craftbox V-Play 20K Puffs Disposable Vape – cited 5 times  
  • Craftbox V-Touch 30,000 Puffs Phone Call Vape Disposable– cited 1 time

 

FDA warns six 'smart e-cigarette' brands, including FUME, Craftbox, and North Vape
Image source: FDA

 

 

North Vape

 


The products cited in the warning letter are:

 

  • North South Connect 35K Puffs Phone Disposable Vape – cited 2 times
  • South Connect 35K Disposable Vape Bluetooth 900mAh – cited 1 time

 

FDA warns six 'smart e-cigarette' brands, including FUME, Craftbox, and North Vape
Image Source: FDA

 

FDA warns six 'smart e-cigarette' brands, including FUME, Craftbox, and North Vape
Image source: FDA

 

 

 Posh 

 


The products cited in the warning letter are:

 

  •  Posh Xtron 30000 Disposable Vape – cited 1 time  
  •  Posh Pro Max 30000 – cited 1 time

 

FDA warns six 'smart e-cigarette' brands, including FUME, Craftbox, and North Vape
Image source: FDA

 

 

Halo Vapor

 


The product cited in the warning letter is:

  • Halo Vapor Synix 30K – cited 2 times

 

FDA warns six 'smart e-cigarette' brands, including FUME, Craftbox, and North Vape
Image source: FDA

 

Swype
 

 

The product cited in the warning letter is:

  • Swype 30K Disposable Vape – cited 1 time

 

FDA warns six 'smart e-cigarette' brands, including FUME, Craftbox, and North Vape
Image source: Vapezilla dealer website

 

According to information disclosed by the FDA, when the agency identifies what it considers to be serious violations of federal requirements, it notifies the relevant parties.

 

This notification typically takes the form of a warning letter, which highlights issues such as poor manufacturing practices, problematic product efficacy claims, or incorrect usage instructions. The letter provides companies or individuals with an opportunity to address the FDA’s concerns, requiring a response within a specified timeframe. This response may include a corrective plan, after which the FDA will conduct follow-up inspections to ensure that corrective measures are sufficient.

 

If a company or individual disagrees with the FDA's assessment, they have the opportunity to present their reasons and supporting information to the FDA. These communications and other actions between the FDA and the letter recipient may alter the regulatory status of the issues discussed in the letter.

 

As of October 30, 2024, the FDA has authorized 34 e-cigarette products and devices. The agency maintains a printable one-page flyer listing all authorized e-cigarette products, which retailers can reference to verify which products may be legally marketed and sold in the United States. Entities manufacturing, importing, selling, or distributing e-cigarettes without the necessary premarket authorization will face enforcement risks.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

BREAKING | China’s Tobacco Regulator Summons iMiracle Over Suspected Compliance Breaches
BREAKING | China’s Tobacco Regulator Summons iMiracle Over Suspected Compliance Breaches
Based on public records reviewed by 2Firsts, this is the first time China’s State Tobacco Monopoly Administration has publicly announced regulatory talks with an e-cigarette company.
Jul.29
From Nicotine Pouches to Soft Candy Forms: China Tobacco Hubei explores adjustable-release oral nicotine products
From Nicotine Pouches to Soft Candy Forms: China Tobacco Hubei explores adjustable-release oral nicotine products
China-based China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Co., Ltd. has filed a patent application covering an oral nicotine product and its preparation method. The patent proposes a soft candy-shaped oral nicotine product containing nicotine ingredients, gelling agents, sweeteners and alkaline pH regulators. Through formulation adjustments and homogeneous or dual-layer structures, the technology aims to achieve different nicotine release profiles. The filing reflects exploration of new oral nicotine product formats and controlled nicotine delivery approaches.
Aug.06
Product | JTI Expands Ploom Ecosystem as LYO Tobacco-Free Nicotine Sticks Roll Out Across Europe
Product | JTI Expands Ploom Ecosystem as LYO Tobacco-Free Nicotine Sticks Roll Out Across Europe
Japan Tobacco International (JTI) is expanding its Ploom heated product ecosystem with LYO tobacco-free nicotine sticks. Designed specifically for Ploom devices, LYO contains nicotine but no tobacco. Public information shows that the product has gradually entered several European markets, including Spain, Portugal and Germany, and was officially introduced in Romania in July 2026. The launch highlights JTI’s efforts to explore broader nicotine consumable formats beyond traditional tobacco-based sticks.
JTI
Jul.21 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Canadian Court Allows Juul and Altria Vape Class Action to Move Forward Over Youth Marketing Claims
Canadian Court Allows Juul and Altria Vape Class Action to Move Forward Over Youth Marketing Claims
A Quebec Superior Court has allowed a class action lawsuit against Juul Labs and Altria Group related to vaping products to proceed, involving allegations concerning marketing practices, youth exposure and corporate responsibility. The ruling only allows the case to move forward and does not represent a finding that Juul or Altria are legally liable. The case highlights continued legal risks facing vape companies regarding product marketing, youth protection and corporate accountability.
Jul.28
WIRED Investigation: Chinese-Made Vapes Turn to 6-Methyl-Nicotine and Other Analogs, Challenging U.S. Regulation
WIRED Investigation: Chinese-Made Vapes Turn to 6-Methyl-Nicotine and Other Analogs, Challenging U.S. Regulation
U.S. technology and investigative publication WIRED has examined how nicotine analogs are emerging as a new challenge for the country’s vape regulatory framework. The article argues that after the U.S. expanded federal oversight of nicotine products in 2022, some manufacturers began using nicotine-like compounds such as 6-methyl-nicotine that may fall outside existing definitions. Researchers cited by WIRED said some nicotine analogs could be more potent than traditional nicotine, although human health impacts remain unclear. U.S. policymakers are considering broader definitions of nicotine to bring these compounds under federal oversight.
Jul.27
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28