Over 20 former FDA lawyers join tobacco industry, sparking calls for conflict-of-interest rules

Oct.30.2024
Over 20 former FDA lawyers join tobacco industry, sparking calls for conflict-of-interest rules
More than 20 U.S. FDA lawyers have left the agency and its Center for Tobacco Products over the past 15 years to provide consulting and support to the tobacco and e-cigarette industries, according to an investigation by The Examination. A former director of FDA's Office of Policy has recommended a ban on former employees working for the tobacco and e-cigarette sectors for at least one to two years after leaving the agency to ensure greater independence.

A review by The Examination reveals that over the past 15 years, more than 20 lawyers from FDA have left the agency and its Center for Tobacco Products to provide consulting and support to the tobacco and e-cigarette industries, GenerationsansTabac reported Oct. 29. (The findings were compiled from a review of biographies, court documents, published works, company websites, and federal records.)

 

FDA’s Office of the Chief Counsel has about 160 lawyers, not counting other legal advisors not involved in litigation who work in various departments, including the Center for Tobacco Products. The tobacco and e-cigarette industries are actively recruiting individuals with insider FDA knowledge to potentially weaken or overturn regulations in certain cases.

 

In 2023, Perham Gorji, a former government lawyer who had helped lead FDA efforts against tobacco and e-cigarette products, left the agency to join DLA Piper, a major law firm representing tobacco and e-cigarette clients, including Philip Morris International. Philip Morris is currently seeking FDA approval for the latest version of its IQOS device. In an interview, Gorji stated he does not see himself as having "joined the opposition," suggesting that Philip Morris is at the forefront of efforts to "help people quit smoking."

 

Recently, Alex Varrone joined the law firm Sidley Austin, which counts Juul Labs and the Philip Morris-funded Foundation for a Smoke-Free World among its clients. Two other former FDA lawyers are representing Wages and White Lion Investments, an investment company backing an e-cigarette manufacturer, in a Supreme Court case challenging FDA’s e-cigarette application reviews.

 

Jessica Tierney’s career offers another example. She joined FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products in 2011 and was involved in issuing warning letters to manufacturers and retailers accused of illegally producing and selling tobacco and e-cigarette products. In 2021, Tierney joined Thompson Hine, a law firm that defends e-cigarette manufacturers, and stated in a press release that she looks forward to helping clients comply with FDA regulations and demystify the agency’s policies and procedures.

 

Conflicts of interest related to FDA extend beyond prohibitions. Some lawyers at FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products have raised internal concerns over former employees representing tobacco and e-cigarette companies. Interviews indicate that some former FDA lawyers maintain contact with ex-colleagues and are privy to internal issues and litigation strategies, which can support the tobacco and e-cigarette industries.

 

Eric Lindblom, former director of FDA’s Office of Policy, has proposed a ban on former employees working for the tobacco and e-cigarette industries for at least one to two years post-departure to ensure greater independence. While his proposal has not been implemented, it has garnered significant attention.

 

Unrestricted conflicts of interest at FDA could have a profound impact on public health. Daniel Aaron, a former FDA legal advisor, noted that lawyers leaving FDA to serve the tobacco and e-cigarette industries could significantly influence the products that end up on store shelves and public health outcomes.

 

When FDA began regulating tobacco in 2009, it relied mainly on lawyers from other divisions or recent law school graduates, who often had little experience with tobacco issues. Public health advocates helped in training these lawyers on critical tobacco topics, yet many felt overwhelmed.

 

Public health experts have previously criticized FDA for its “inaction” and “caution” regarding tobacco. The agency took over a decade to advance a rule targeting menthol cigarettes, a measure that could save thousands of lives in the U.S. 

 

While FDA proposed a ban on these products in October 2023, it was delayed due to lobbying from tobacco companies. Public health organizations have filed lawsuits to challenge this delay, stepping up efforts to prove that FDA has never properly advanced the menthol ban.

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Nearly Half of Seoul Vape Vending Machines Bypassed by Fake IDs, Raising Youth Access Concerns
Nearly Half of Seoul Vape Vending Machines Bypassed by Fake IDs, Raising Youth Access Concerns
Seoul city authorities inspected 339 tobacco vending machines at e-cigarette retailers and found that 168, or 49.5%, allowed purchases using fake IDs, showing that unmanned retail terminals and adult-verification systems remain a major enforcement gap after e-cigarettes were brought under tobacco regulation.
Market
Jul.03 by 2Firsts Perspectives
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
Multiple JTI-backed studies in the UK and Ireland indicate that illicit tobacco remains visible across consumer interactions and local markets. In the UK, JTI research found that 31% of respondents said they had been offered illicit tobacco products. In Ireland’s Ennis area, a JTI-commissioned empty pack survey found that 63% of sampled cigarette packs did not carry Irish duty-paid markings. The findings come from industry research rather than official government estimates of illicit tobacco market size, but highlight continued concerns among regulators, legitimate retailers and tobacco companies over illicit trade.
Aug.19
Kantar Study Finds More Than 93% of Vape Products in Ukraine Fail Regulatory Requirements
Kantar Study Finds More Than 93% of Vape Products in Ukraine Fail Regulatory Requirements
According to Interfax-Ukraine, a study conducted by market research firm Kantar Ukraine at the request of major tobacco companies found that more than 93% of vape products in Ukraine did not fully comply with regulatory requirements. The research examined product categories, brand distribution and consumer purchasing channels, showing that pod systems and disposable vapes represent major segments of the market, while offline retail remains the dominant purchasing channel. The findings highlight ongoing compliance challenges in Ukraine’s vape market.
Aug.26
BAT Regional Director Fred Monteiro Supports Spain’s Nicotine Rules but Opposes 0.99mg Nicotine Pouch Limit
BAT Regional Director Fred Monteiro Supports Spain’s Nicotine Rules but Opposes 0.99mg Nicotine Pouch Limit
Spanish newspaper El Confidencial interviewed Fred Monteiro, Regional Director for Americas and Europe at British American Tobacco (BAT). Monteiro said BAT supports setting regulatory limits for nicotine products but opposes Spain’s proposed 0.99mg nicotine-per-pouch limit, arguing that such a restriction could affect adult smokers’ transition to alternatives. He said nicotine regulation should be based on scientific evidence and harm reduction principles. Monteiro also said smoke-free products now account for around 25% of BAT’s Americas and Europe business and nearly 30% of its Europe business
BAT
Jul.30
JT’s Ploom Volumes Rise 43.5% as Cigarettes Anchor Its Transition
JT’s Ploom Volumes Rise 43.5% as Cigarettes Anchor Its Transition
JT’s Ploom heated-tobacco volumes rose 43.5% in the first half of 2026, while combustibles still represented about 97% of its tobacco volume and remained the main earnings base. In Japan, reduced-risk products now account for 48.7% of industry shipments, shifting competition from category adoption towards brand share, pricing and consumer retention. JT’s results offer a revealing case of a traditional tobacco company pursuing a prolonged, dual-track transformation.
JTI
Jul.30
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the FDA’s denial of MH Global LLC’s applications to market flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The court ruled that FDA’s comparative-efficacy framework, which requires applicants to show that flavored products provide greater cessation or switching benefits than tobacco-flavored alternatives, is consistent with the Tobacco Control Act’s “appropriate for the protection of the public health” standard. The court also found that FDA was not required to establish the framework through notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Aug.26