Over 20 former FDA lawyers join tobacco industry, sparking calls for conflict-of-interest rules

Oct.30.2024
Over 20 former FDA lawyers join tobacco industry, sparking calls for conflict-of-interest rules
More than 20 U.S. FDA lawyers have left the agency and its Center for Tobacco Products over the past 15 years to provide consulting and support to the tobacco and e-cigarette industries, according to an investigation by The Examination. A former director of FDA's Office of Policy has recommended a ban on former employees working for the tobacco and e-cigarette sectors for at least one to two years after leaving the agency to ensure greater independence.

A review by The Examination reveals that over the past 15 years, more than 20 lawyers from FDA have left the agency and its Center for Tobacco Products to provide consulting and support to the tobacco and e-cigarette industries, GenerationsansTabac reported Oct. 29. (The findings were compiled from a review of biographies, court documents, published works, company websites, and federal records.)

 

FDA’s Office of the Chief Counsel has about 160 lawyers, not counting other legal advisors not involved in litigation who work in various departments, including the Center for Tobacco Products. The tobacco and e-cigarette industries are actively recruiting individuals with insider FDA knowledge to potentially weaken or overturn regulations in certain cases.

 

In 2023, Perham Gorji, a former government lawyer who had helped lead FDA efforts against tobacco and e-cigarette products, left the agency to join DLA Piper, a major law firm representing tobacco and e-cigarette clients, including Philip Morris International. Philip Morris is currently seeking FDA approval for the latest version of its IQOS device. In an interview, Gorji stated he does not see himself as having "joined the opposition," suggesting that Philip Morris is at the forefront of efforts to "help people quit smoking."

 

Recently, Alex Varrone joined the law firm Sidley Austin, which counts Juul Labs and the Philip Morris-funded Foundation for a Smoke-Free World among its clients. Two other former FDA lawyers are representing Wages and White Lion Investments, an investment company backing an e-cigarette manufacturer, in a Supreme Court case challenging FDA’s e-cigarette application reviews.

 

Jessica Tierney’s career offers another example. She joined FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products in 2011 and was involved in issuing warning letters to manufacturers and retailers accused of illegally producing and selling tobacco and e-cigarette products. In 2021, Tierney joined Thompson Hine, a law firm that defends e-cigarette manufacturers, and stated in a press release that she looks forward to helping clients comply with FDA regulations and demystify the agency’s policies and procedures.

 

Conflicts of interest related to FDA extend beyond prohibitions. Some lawyers at FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products have raised internal concerns over former employees representing tobacco and e-cigarette companies. Interviews indicate that some former FDA lawyers maintain contact with ex-colleagues and are privy to internal issues and litigation strategies, which can support the tobacco and e-cigarette industries.

 

Eric Lindblom, former director of FDA’s Office of Policy, has proposed a ban on former employees working for the tobacco and e-cigarette industries for at least one to two years post-departure to ensure greater independence. While his proposal has not been implemented, it has garnered significant attention.

 

Unrestricted conflicts of interest at FDA could have a profound impact on public health. Daniel Aaron, a former FDA legal advisor, noted that lawyers leaving FDA to serve the tobacco and e-cigarette industries could significantly influence the products that end up on store shelves and public health outcomes.

 

When FDA began regulating tobacco in 2009, it relied mainly on lawyers from other divisions or recent law school graduates, who often had little experience with tobacco issues. Public health advocates helped in training these lawyers on critical tobacco topics, yet many felt overwhelmed.

 

Public health experts have previously criticized FDA for its “inaction” and “caution” regarding tobacco. The agency took over a decade to advance a rule targeting menthol cigarettes, a measure that could save thousands of lives in the U.S. 

 

While FDA proposed a ban on these products in October 2023, it was delayed due to lobbying from tobacco companies. Public health organizations have filed lawsuits to challenge this delay, stepping up efforts to prove that FDA has never properly advanced the menthol ban.

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Charlie’s Plans Q3 2026 Pilot of America’s First Age-Gated Flavored Disposable Vape
Charlie’s Plans Q3 2026 Pilot of America’s First Age-Gated Flavored Disposable Vape
U.S. vape company Charlie’s Holdings announced plans to pilot its age-gated flavored disposable vape products in hundreds of retail stores during the third quarter of 2026. The company said the products will utilize AI- and blockchain-powered age-verification technology designed to address FDA concerns over youth access and potentially create a new compliance pathway for flavored vape products.
Jun.15
Nicotine Beyond Tobacco? Cell Study Signals Emerging Shift in Production Systems
Nicotine Beyond Tobacco? Cell Study Signals Emerging Shift in Production Systems
Researchers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences reconstructed nicotine biosynthesis in non-tobacco plants and yeast systems, highlighting how advances in synthetic biology could gradually reshape future nicotine production technologies and challenge regulatory frameworks built around tobacco-derived definitions.
Special Report
May.07
China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Patent Discloses Nicotine Tooth Patch for Fixed Oral Delivery
China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Patent Discloses Nicotine Tooth Patch for Fixed Oral Delivery
According to Chinese patent records, a “nicotine tooth patch” application filed by China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Corporation (CTHB) and Hubei Xinye Tobacco Sheet Development Co., Ltd. was published on May 19, 2026. The filing proposes a nicotine gel patch that adheres to the tooth surface, especially the lingual side, to reduce displacement, foreign-body sensation, and accidental swallowing risks associated with existing oral nicotine products.
Jun.10
Why Many E-Liquids Today Are "Not Bad, but Not Memorable" – Mylor’s Approach to Experience Design
Why Many E-Liquids Today Are "Not Bad, but Not Memorable" – Mylor’s Approach to Experience Design
From May 8 to 10, 2026, Mylor (Booth E70) will exhibit at The Vaper Expo UK, where it will showcase its systematic experience design solutions for e-liquids. At present, the e-liquid market commonly faces a challenge: many products have “no obvious shortcomings, but lack memorable features.” In response, Mylor has proposed refined solutions across multiple dimensions, including device-adaptive sweetness, progressive cooling sensation, fruit-oriented sourness, and segmented nicotine experience.
May.08
BofA: U.S. Nicotine Market Splits as Vapor Sales Fall 17.2% and Oral Tobacco Rises 5.8%
BofA: U.S. Nicotine Market Splits as Vapor Sales Fall 17.2% and Oral Tobacco Rises 5.8%
According to Investing.com citing Bank of America scanner data for the four weeks ending May 30, U.S. nicotine category performance was mixed, with cigarette, vapor and cigar sales declining while oral tobacco sales rose 5.8%.
Jun.10
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai