Over 20 former FDA lawyers join tobacco industry, sparking calls for conflict-of-interest rules

Oct.30.2024
Over 20 former FDA lawyers join tobacco industry, sparking calls for conflict-of-interest rules
More than 20 U.S. FDA lawyers have left the agency and its Center for Tobacco Products over the past 15 years to provide consulting and support to the tobacco and e-cigarette industries, according to an investigation by The Examination. A former director of FDA's Office of Policy has recommended a ban on former employees working for the tobacco and e-cigarette sectors for at least one to two years after leaving the agency to ensure greater independence.

A review by The Examination reveals that over the past 15 years, more than 20 lawyers from FDA have left the agency and its Center for Tobacco Products to provide consulting and support to the tobacco and e-cigarette industries, GenerationsansTabac reported Oct. 29. (The findings were compiled from a review of biographies, court documents, published works, company websites, and federal records.)

 

FDA’s Office of the Chief Counsel has about 160 lawyers, not counting other legal advisors not involved in litigation who work in various departments, including the Center for Tobacco Products. The tobacco and e-cigarette industries are actively recruiting individuals with insider FDA knowledge to potentially weaken or overturn regulations in certain cases.

 

In 2023, Perham Gorji, a former government lawyer who had helped lead FDA efforts against tobacco and e-cigarette products, left the agency to join DLA Piper, a major law firm representing tobacco and e-cigarette clients, including Philip Morris International. Philip Morris is currently seeking FDA approval for the latest version of its IQOS device. In an interview, Gorji stated he does not see himself as having "joined the opposition," suggesting that Philip Morris is at the forefront of efforts to "help people quit smoking."

 

Recently, Alex Varrone joined the law firm Sidley Austin, which counts Juul Labs and the Philip Morris-funded Foundation for a Smoke-Free World among its clients. Two other former FDA lawyers are representing Wages and White Lion Investments, an investment company backing an e-cigarette manufacturer, in a Supreme Court case challenging FDA’s e-cigarette application reviews.

 

Jessica Tierney’s career offers another example. She joined FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products in 2011 and was involved in issuing warning letters to manufacturers and retailers accused of illegally producing and selling tobacco and e-cigarette products. In 2021, Tierney joined Thompson Hine, a law firm that defends e-cigarette manufacturers, and stated in a press release that she looks forward to helping clients comply with FDA regulations and demystify the agency’s policies and procedures.

 

Conflicts of interest related to FDA extend beyond prohibitions. Some lawyers at FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products have raised internal concerns over former employees representing tobacco and e-cigarette companies. Interviews indicate that some former FDA lawyers maintain contact with ex-colleagues and are privy to internal issues and litigation strategies, which can support the tobacco and e-cigarette industries.

 

Eric Lindblom, former director of FDA’s Office of Policy, has proposed a ban on former employees working for the tobacco and e-cigarette industries for at least one to two years post-departure to ensure greater independence. While his proposal has not been implemented, it has garnered significant attention.

 

Unrestricted conflicts of interest at FDA could have a profound impact on public health. Daniel Aaron, a former FDA legal advisor, noted that lawyers leaving FDA to serve the tobacco and e-cigarette industries could significantly influence the products that end up on store shelves and public health outcomes.

 

When FDA began regulating tobacco in 2009, it relied mainly on lawyers from other divisions or recent law school graduates, who often had little experience with tobacco issues. Public health advocates helped in training these lawyers on critical tobacco topics, yet many felt overwhelmed.

 

Public health experts have previously criticized FDA for its “inaction” and “caution” regarding tobacco. The agency took over a decade to advance a rule targeting menthol cigarettes, a measure that could save thousands of lives in the U.S. 

 

While FDA proposed a ban on these products in October 2023, it was delayed due to lobbying from tobacco companies. Public health organizations have filed lawsuits to challenge this delay, stepping up efforts to prove that FDA has never properly advanced the menthol ban.

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

China Tobacco Zhejiang files patent for pressure-triggered, on-demand oral nicotine release
China Tobacco Zhejiang files patent for pressure-triggered, on-demand oral nicotine release
China Tobacco Zhejiang Industrial Co., Ltd. has filed a patent application for an oral nicotine delivery product designed to let users actively adjust nicotine release. The product embeds two types of nicotine reservoirs with different wall thicknesses and positions inside a deformable matrix. Pressure applied with the tongue or lips can rupture the reservoirs and accelerate nicotine release. In simulated oral tests, several patent examples showed sharply higher peak nicotine release rates as applied force increased from 0 N to 1 N and 3 N. The filing explores a shift from preset release profiles toward user-triggered nicotine delivery.
Sep.01
GAO Audit Finds Nearly 132,000 FDA Tobacco Applications Waiting an Average 1,266 Days as Nicotine Pouch Pilot Practices Move Into Vape PMTA Reviews
GAO Audit Finds Nearly 132,000 FDA Tobacco Applications Waiting an Average 1,266 Days as Nicotine Pouch Pilot Practices Move Into Vape PMTA Reviews
A U.S. Government Accountability Office audit found that 131,915 tobacco product applications submitted to the FDA since 2018 remained without a final review as of December 31, 2025, with pending applications waiting an average of 1,266 days. GAO also found FDA lacks the data needed to systematically determine whether scientific reviews meet applicable timelines. HHS agreed to upgrade the agency's tracking systems. At the same time, FDA has begun applying lessons from its nicotine pouch PMTA pilot to e-cigarette reviews, while changes to enforcement policy and electronic submissions are making the specific stage of a PMTA increasingly relevant to market access.
FDA
Oct.03
2Firsts On-Site | CTIHK Showcases Nicotine Pouches, Heated Tobacco and Chinese Cigars at InterTabac 2026
2Firsts On-Site | CTIHK Showcases Nicotine Pouches, Heated Tobacco and Chinese Cigars at InterTabac 2026
At InterTabac 2026 in Dortmund, China Tobacco International (HK) Company Limited (CTIHK) is exhibiting across two separate booths in Hall 5 and Hall 4. Products observed by 2Firsts include heated tobacco products, nicotine pouches, Chinese cigars and tobacco leaf. Nicotine pouch products on display include TOOP, Shuangxi and Ashima.
Market
Sep.16
Charlie’s Bets on Age-Gating and 678 PMTA Assets as U.S. Vape Enforcement Landscape Shifts
Charlie’s Bets on Age-Gating and 678 PMTA Assets as U.S. Vape Enforcement Landscape Shifts
Charlie’s Holdings said in its latest shareholder letter that it is moving to commercialize PACHA products and monetize its PMTA assets as the FDA changes enforcement priorities for unauthorized ENDS products. Thirty PACHA SKUs were previously tentatively identified for a proposed public list of products that the FDA generally does not intend to prioritize for enforcement. Charlie’s is also preparing test-market sales of age-gated flavored disposables and says it currently holds 678 PMTA-related product assets while seeking additional strategic transactions and partnerships.
Sep.11
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
South Korea Fully Reviews Nicotine-Analog and Nicotine-Free Vape Liquid Imports, With Over 99% From China and Chinese Supply-Chain Documents Under Scrutiny
South Korea Fully Reviews Nicotine-Analog and Nicotine-Free Vape Liquid Imports, With Over 99% From China and Chinese Supply-Chain Documents Under Scrutiny
Korea Customs Service has tightened import controls on nicotine-analog and nicotine-free e-cigarette liquids, placing the products under 100% document review and subjecting all e-cigarette liquid import declarations to pre-clearance ingredient analysis. As of September 20, 2026, South Korea had imported about 15 metric tons of nicotine-analog liquids, 99.99% from China, and about 316 metric tons of nicotine-free liquids, including roughly 315 metric tons, or 99.7%, from China. The measures follow South Korea's April expansion of its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine products and include new checks on Chinese manufacturing, transaction and export documentation.
Sep.24