Study Finds Concerning Trends Among E-cigarette Users in UK

Sep.30.2024
Study Finds Concerning Trends Among E-cigarette Users in UK
A study of 1,020 e-cigarette users found 39% may buy from unregulated sources, raising concerns about safety.

According to a report by Internewscast on September 29th, a study conducted on 1,020 e-cigarette users found that 39% of them admitted that they may purchase e-cigarettes from unregulated channels that have not been officially safety-checked.


The research results also show that one-third of the respondents believe that their nicotine consumption will increase. However, 22% of people believe that the upcoming law will motivate them to quit their e-cigarette habit.


A study commissioned by the nicotine pouch brand Übbs and retailer Haypp, carried out by OnePoll.com, aimed to respond to the UK government's commitment to achieve a "smoke-free Britain". Earlier this year, the UK government announced legislation that will restrict the sale and use of disposable e-cigarettes by 2025.


According to the survey, since the ban on e-cigarettes was announced, 24% of respondents have attempted to quit using them. 26% of respondents have switched to other alternatives, such as traditional cigarettes (36%), nicotine pouches (26%), and gum (25%).


The study also found that 85% of the respondents had smoked before switching to e-cigarettes, with 52% of them expressing concern about reverting to smoking habits after the ban is implemented.


The spokesperson for the Übbs brand, Steve McGeough, stated that,


Hearing e-cigarette users say they will seriously consider switching to smoking after the ban is implemented is really concerning. Additionally, research also shows that some people may even seek unregulated e-cigarettes, which is very worrying in terms of quality and safety. Our research suggests that while disposable e-cigarettes may be gradually phased out, there are still many safe and regulated alternatives available now or when the ban comes into effect. Nicotine pouches are a popular choice, providing support for the UK's goal to become a smoke-free nation.


The study also found that 73% of e-cigarette users have not tried any e-cigarette alternatives. However, among them, 28% are most likely to try traditional cigarettes, 21% are willing to try gum, and 25% are open to trying nicotine pouches.


Additionally, 30% of respondents are "very aware" of the risks of using unregulated e-cigarettes. The most familiar features of such devices among respondents include the lack of nicotine warning labels (41%) and the absence of emissions testing information (30%). When looking for alternatives, 52% of people prioritize the smell and taste of the product, followed by considerations of safety and quality assurance (50%), and the product's discreteness (33%). 30% of individuals prefer products that are "readily available," while 24% believe that open system e-cigarettes are too complicated.


The study also revealed that running out of battery is the most annoying thing when using e-cigarettes (32%), followed by not being able to use them freely anytime and anywhere (30%). Another major concern is having to leave social gatherings to smoke and missing out on time with friends (23%), and the issue of not being able to use e-cigarettes on airplanes (21%).


Haypp spokesperson Markus Lindbald stated,


From a positive perspective, it is a good phenomenon that before the ban is implemented, so many people are trying to quit e-cigarettes or explore other low-risk alternatives, such as nicotine pouches, instead of turning back to smoking. Based on the nearly smokeless experience in Sweden, nicotine pouches can play an important role in reducing smoking rates and improving public and personal health.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia’s government has withdrawn its appeal against a High Court ruling concerning the regulatory status of liquid nicotine used in vape and e-cigarette products, according to reports by New Straits Times, Free Malaysia Today and CodeBlue on August 18, 2026. The Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled on May 15 that the government’s decision to remove liquid nicotine from the scheduled poisons list under the Poisons Act 1952 was irrational and made without proper consultation with the Poisons Board. The withdrawal ends the government’s appeal process, while the future regulatory framework for nicotine vape products remains under discussion.
Aug.21
Wisconsin Vape Directory One Year On: Retailer Reports Four Store Closures and 70% Staff Cuts
Wisconsin Vape Directory One Year On: Retailer Reports Four Store Closures and 70% Staff Cuts
Wisconsin's electronic vaping device directory has been fully enforced for more than a year, and local vape retailers say the reduced range of eligible products has contributed to declining sales, store closures and layoffs. Johnny Vapes owner Ben Hall said he has closed four of seven locations and cut about 70% of his staff. State law bars the sale of vaping devices not listed on the Wisconsin Department of Revenue directory and allows penalties of $1,000 per day for each unlisted device sold or offered for sale. In April 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit allowed enforcement of the law to continue.
Regulations
Oct.10
Cochrane 2026 Update Adds Nine Trials, Keeps High-Certainty Finding That Nicotine E-Cigarettes Improve Quit Rates Over NRT
Cochrane 2026 Update Adds Nine Trials, Keeps High-Certainty Finding That Nicotine E-Cigarettes Improve Quit Rates Over NRT
Cochrane’s 2026 update of its living review on electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation included 80 randomized controlled trials involving 29,861 adult smokers, with nine trials added in this update. The review retained its high-certainty conclusion that nicotine e-cigarettes increase smoking cessation rates compared with nicotine replacement therapy. In absolute terms, about 10 in 100 people using nicotine e-cigarettes may quit smoking for at least six months, compared with about 6 in 100 using NRT. The review found no clear difference in serious adverse event rates between the two groups, while longer-term safety and the relative effectiveness of newer device types remain less certain.
Sep.07
U.S. Judge Stays Helix, NJOY Challenge to FDA PMTA Rule Pending New Rulemaking Court Stays Altria's Helix, NJOY Challenge to PMTA Rule as FDA Prepares New Rulemaking
U.S. Judge Stays Helix, NJOY Challenge to FDA PMTA Rule Pending New Rulemaking Court Stays Altria's Helix, NJOY Challenge to PMTA Rule as FDA Prepares New Rulemaking
A federal judge in Texas on Oct. 8 granted a joint request by the FDA and plaintiffs including Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY to stay litigation challenging the agency's 2021 PMTA rule. The court cited FDA's anticipated rulemaking concerning the regulation at issue. FDA announced on Sept. 28 that it intends to reassess the PMTA framework and could initiate new rulemaking to replace it. The parties must file a joint status report within 45 days and every 45 days thereafter. A motion by three Reynolds American companies to intervene remains pending.
Regulations
Oct.10
UK HMRC Urges Public to Report Suspicious Vape Shops in Crackdown on Tax Fraud, Money Laundering and Illicit Tobacco Sales
UK HMRC Urges Public to Report Suspicious Vape Shops in Crackdown on Tax Fraud, Money Laundering and Illicit Tobacco Sales
HM Revenue & Customs is urging members of the public to report vape shops, barber shops and other high-street businesses suspected of tax fraud, money laundering or other illegal activity, with informants not required to provide personal details. HMRC plans more than 30,000 interventions in 2026-27 targeting tax fraud, organised crime and illicit activity, including the sale of illegal vapes and tobacco. The push forms part of a broader UK effort to tackle organised crime on high streets, backed by a £30 million government enforcement programme.
Regulations
Aug.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
According to Law360 on August 31, 2026, a federal judge in North Carolina ruled that a patent sublicense between R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and Juul Labs Inc. relieves Reynolds of its obligation to continue paying royalties to Altria Client Services LLC over Vuse Alto. A jury had previously found that Vuse Alto infringed three Altria patents and awarded approximately $95.2 million in past damages, after which Reynolds was ordered to pay an ongoing royalty equal to 5.25% of positive net sales. The new ruling finds that a valid sublicense can eliminate future infringement, potentially ending what Altria described as hundreds of millions of dollars in future royalties.
Sep.01