Juul and Altria settlement payments begin as some users confirm payments received

Oct.25.2024
Juul and Altria settlement payments begin as some users confirm payments received
Juul Labs has begun issuing settlement payments following its agreement with Altria, with a total payout of $300 million. Users have reported on social media that they've received amounts ranging from a few hundred dollars to over $9,000.

The 2022 settlement agreement between e-cigarette company Juul and tobacco company Altria has begun to be paid out, with users on platforms such as Reddit and X claiming to have already received thousands of dollars in compensation, according to a 22 October report from Forbes.

 

The settlement amount for this case is $3 billion, to be paid jointly by Juul and Altria. The lawsuit alleged that consumers paid inflated prices for e-cigarettes, that Juul failed to accurately disclose the addictive and safety risks of its products, and that it engaged in illegal marketing to minors.

 

The payouts were approved earlier this month, according to the r/juul subreddit. Users have reported receiving amounts ranging from a few hundred dollars to over $9,000. Some X users have shared screenshots of their payments, while others are disappointed that they were not included in the settlement list. The settlement agreement includes consumers who purchased Juul products before 7 December 2022. Juul did not admit any wrongdoing in the settlement, and Altria has denied the allegations against it.

 

Juul and Altria settlement payments begin as some users confirm payments received
Some users of platform X claim to have received compensation | Image source: X

 

 

Juul and Altria settlement payments begin as some users confirm payments received
Some X platform users claimed to have received compensation | Image source: X

 

The amount of compensation is influenced by several factors, including the amount the claimant spent on Juul products, the time period of the purchase, and the age at the time of the purchase. Obviously, users who spent more during the qualifying period will receive more compensation.

 

The class action stems from more than 8,000 lawsuits filed against Juul by municipalities, school districts, indigenous tribes and individuals. In 2019, Juul stopped advertising in the US market and discontinued most of its flavoured products due to legal disputes and government sanctions.

 

Following a multi-state investigation into its marketing practices, the company reached a settlement agreement for nearly $4.4 billion, followed by another agreement for $3 billion. In 2018, Altria had invested nearly $13 billion in Juul, but pulled out of the investment last year and invested in another competing startup. Juul avoided bankruptcy through cost-cutting, massive layoffs and support from wealthy investors.
 

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Product | 5ml/2ml Dual Versions, Up to 45W Output: VAPORESSO Launches LUXE X3 on Official Website
Product | 5ml/2ml Dual Versions, Up to 45W Output: VAPORESSO Launches LUXE X3 on Official Website
VAPORESSO has listed the LUXE X3, a new addition to its LUXE X series, on its official website. The device features a 2,600mAh built-in battery, adjustable 5–45W output and a 0.8-inch digital display, and comes with a 5ml pod (2ml for the TPD version). The LUXE X3 has also appeared on some UK and US online retailers for pre-order, with prices below the company’s stated MSRP of $37.9.
Jan.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
2Firsts Observation | Element Vape Launches “Made in USA” Section as Product Pages Show “Assembled in USA” and “Made in USA” Labels
2Firsts Observation | Element Vape Launches “Made in USA” Section as Product Pages Show “Assembled in USA” and “Made in USA” Labels
Element Vape, a U.S. online vaping retailer, uses origin labels such as “Made in USA” and “Assembled in USA” across disposable vape product pages and a dedicated collection page, grouping items under “Made in USA Disposable Vapes,” but the platform does not disclose on its public pages the applicable standards or evidentiary basis for these different claims.
Jan.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Fiscal benefit, not health, strongest indicator for vape bans – Contributed by Samrat Chowdhery
Fiscal benefit, not health, strongest indicator for vape bans – Contributed by Samrat Chowdhery
Data shows 75% of nations with state stakes in tobacco trade ban modern substitutes compared to 10% in the free-market group. What is driving these divergent regulations?
Feb.04
PMI Faces Setback in India: Global Regulatory Fragmentation Complicates Its Smoke-Free Transition
PMI Faces Setback in India: Global Regulatory Fragmentation Complicates Its Smoke-Free Transition
India has reaffirmed its 2019 ban on e-cigarettes and heated tobacco devices, effectively blocking Philip Morris International (PMI) from launching IQOS in the country despite years of lobbying. Together with Taiwan, China’s conditional opening of heated tobacco products, and Japan’s planned 2026 excise tax hikes, these moves highlight increasingly divergent national regulatory pathways—an external uncertainty shaping PMI’s smoke-free growth trajectory.
Feb.12
Illinois HB 4652 Targets Discarded Vapes, Would Require Manufacturer-Funded Disposal Programs
Illinois HB 4652 Targets Discarded Vapes, Would Require Manufacturer-Funded Disposal Programs
Illinois House Bill 4652 proposes e-cigarette companies establish and fund safe disposal programs to combat environmental risks.
Mar.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Daegu Jung-gu: liquid e-cigarettes with synthetic nicotine to be fined in nonsmoking areas under revised Tobacco Business Act
Daegu Jung-gu: liquid e-cigarettes with synthetic nicotine to be fined in nonsmoking areas under revised Tobacco Business Act
Daegu’s Jung-gu District announced on Feb. 10 that, following amendments to the Tobacco Business Act that explicitly classify liquid e-cigarettes containing synthetic nicotine as “tobacco” (effective April 24, 2026), the district will expand regulations to include fines for vaping such products in designated nonsmoking areas. The district health office said smokers/vapers could face an administrative fine of up to 100,000 won for using synthetic-nicotine liquid e-cigarettes in smoke-free zones
Feb.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai