Juul and Altria settlement payments begin as some users confirm payments received

Oct.25.2024
Juul and Altria settlement payments begin as some users confirm payments received
Juul Labs has begun issuing settlement payments following its agreement with Altria, with a total payout of $300 million. Users have reported on social media that they've received amounts ranging from a few hundred dollars to over $9,000.

The 2022 settlement agreement between e-cigarette company Juul and tobacco company Altria has begun to be paid out, with users on platforms such as Reddit and X claiming to have already received thousands of dollars in compensation, according to a 22 October report from Forbes.

 

The settlement amount for this case is $3 billion, to be paid jointly by Juul and Altria. The lawsuit alleged that consumers paid inflated prices for e-cigarettes, that Juul failed to accurately disclose the addictive and safety risks of its products, and that it engaged in illegal marketing to minors.

 

The payouts were approved earlier this month, according to the r/juul subreddit. Users have reported receiving amounts ranging from a few hundred dollars to over $9,000. Some X users have shared screenshots of their payments, while others are disappointed that they were not included in the settlement list. The settlement agreement includes consumers who purchased Juul products before 7 December 2022. Juul did not admit any wrongdoing in the settlement, and Altria has denied the allegations against it.

 

Juul and Altria settlement payments begin as some users confirm payments received
Some users of platform X claim to have received compensation | Image source: X

 

 

Juul and Altria settlement payments begin as some users confirm payments received
Some X platform users claimed to have received compensation | Image source: X

 

The amount of compensation is influenced by several factors, including the amount the claimant spent on Juul products, the time period of the purchase, and the age at the time of the purchase. Obviously, users who spent more during the qualifying period will receive more compensation.

 

The class action stems from more than 8,000 lawsuits filed against Juul by municipalities, school districts, indigenous tribes and individuals. In 2019, Juul stopped advertising in the US market and discontinued most of its flavoured products due to legal disputes and government sanctions.

 

Following a multi-state investigation into its marketing practices, the company reached a settlement agreement for nearly $4.4 billion, followed by another agreement for $3 billion. In 2018, Altria had invested nearly $13 billion in Juul, but pulled out of the investment last year and invested in another competing startup. Juul avoided bankruptcy through cost-cutting, massive layoffs and support from wealthy investors.
 

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

AP Questions FDA Rationale as Glas Fruit-Flavored Vapes Won Authorization Without Added Cessation Benefit
AP Questions FDA Rationale as Glas Fruit-Flavored Vapes Won Authorization Without Added Cessation Benefit
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently authorized two fruit-flavored vaping products from Glas, but a newly released agency memo shows the products did not demonstrate greater smoking-cessation benefits than tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes. The Associated Press said the findings are likely to raise further questions about the FDA’s regulatory rationale and standards for flavored vaping products.
Jun.12
Japan’s Heated Tobacco Tax Changes Reshape Consumer Choices, Survey Reveals Impact of Price and Income
Japan’s Heated Tobacco Tax Changes Reshape Consumer Choices, Survey Reveals Impact of Price and Income
A consumer survey by Japanese heated tobacco information platform RELAZO found that rising tobacco prices and planned heated tobacco tax changes may influence smoking decisions among Japanese consumers. The survey covered 49,879 men and women aged 20 to 69 nationwide. It found that around 40% of respondents cumulatively indicated they may consider quitting when a pack reaches ¥600 (approximately US$4.1), while nearly 90% expressed potential quitting intentions at a ¥1,000 (approximately US$6.8) price level. The survey also found significant differences by income level, with lower-income respondents showing greater sensitivity to price increases.
Jul.24
Scotland Plans to Remove Business Rates Relief From Vape Shops From 2027
Scotland Plans to Remove Business Rates Relief From Vape Shops From 2027
The Scottish Government plans to remove business rates relief from vape shops from April 1, 2027, saying the measure is intended to ensure vape retailers contribute to the high street and align rates relief with public health commitments, while the impact on convenience stores that sell vaping products remains unclear.
News
Jun.26 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Philip Morris Italia Invests €1 Million to Upgrade Retail Network, Supporting 45,000 Tobacco Shops in Smoke-Free Shift
Philip Morris Italia Invests €1 Million to Upgrade Retail Network, Supporting 45,000 Tobacco Shops in Smoke-Free Shift
Philip Morris Italia has launched the Trade Academy program, investing €1 million to provide training and development support for approximately 45,000 tobacco retailers in Italy. The initiative aims to strengthen retailers’ capabilities in heated tobacco products, digital tools and consumer services. The move reflects how nicotine companies are increasingly investing in retail networks and frontline capabilities as new nicotine products become more important in the market.
Jul.28
  South Korea Reopens Cigarette Tax Debate as 63% Back Higher Tobacco Taxes
South Korea Reopens Cigarette Tax Debate as 63% Back Higher Tobacco Taxes
South Korea’s cigarette tax debate has resurfaced after the Ministry of Health and Welfare said tobacco price policy needed review, with a poll showing 63% of respondents support higher tobacco taxes.
Regulations
Jun.22
Bringing Tax and Insurance Into Nicotine Regulation: Insights From a Tobacco Harm-Reduction Report
Bringing Tax and Insurance Into Nicotine Regulation: Insights From a Tobacco Harm-Reduction Report
A smoke-free nicotine policy report argues that tobacco harm reduction should move beyond product bans and health warnings into tax policy, insurance pricing and risk-based regulation. While some projections remain open to debate, the report highlights a wider challenge: nicotine products, technologies and consumer behavior have changed sharply over the past decade, and regulatory systems may need new tools to better align tobacco control with harm-reduction goals.
Jun.08