Juul and Altria settlement payments begin as some users confirm payments received

Oct.25.2024
Juul and Altria settlement payments begin as some users confirm payments received
Juul Labs has begun issuing settlement payments following its agreement with Altria, with a total payout of $300 million. Users have reported on social media that they've received amounts ranging from a few hundred dollars to over $9,000.

The 2022 settlement agreement between e-cigarette company Juul and tobacco company Altria has begun to be paid out, with users on platforms such as Reddit and X claiming to have already received thousands of dollars in compensation, according to a 22 October report from Forbes.

 

The settlement amount for this case is $3 billion, to be paid jointly by Juul and Altria. The lawsuit alleged that consumers paid inflated prices for e-cigarettes, that Juul failed to accurately disclose the addictive and safety risks of its products, and that it engaged in illegal marketing to minors.

 

The payouts were approved earlier this month, according to the r/juul subreddit. Users have reported receiving amounts ranging from a few hundred dollars to over $9,000. Some X users have shared screenshots of their payments, while others are disappointed that they were not included in the settlement list. The settlement agreement includes consumers who purchased Juul products before 7 December 2022. Juul did not admit any wrongdoing in the settlement, and Altria has denied the allegations against it.

 

Juul and Altria settlement payments begin as some users confirm payments received
Some users of platform X claim to have received compensation | Image source: X

 

 

Juul and Altria settlement payments begin as some users confirm payments received
Some X platform users claimed to have received compensation | Image source: X

 

The amount of compensation is influenced by several factors, including the amount the claimant spent on Juul products, the time period of the purchase, and the age at the time of the purchase. Obviously, users who spent more during the qualifying period will receive more compensation.

 

The class action stems from more than 8,000 lawsuits filed against Juul by municipalities, school districts, indigenous tribes and individuals. In 2019, Juul stopped advertising in the US market and discontinued most of its flavoured products due to legal disputes and government sanctions.

 

Following a multi-state investigation into its marketing practices, the company reached a settlement agreement for nearly $4.4 billion, followed by another agreement for $3 billion. In 2018, Altria had invested nearly $13 billion in Juul, but pulled out of the investment last year and invested in another competing startup. Juul avoided bankruptcy through cost-cutting, massive layoffs and support from wealthy investors.
 

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Aurora advances retail tobacco licensing ordinance to curb under-21 access to vapes and tobacco
Aurora advances retail tobacco licensing ordinance to curb under-21 access to vapes and tobacco
The Denver Post reported that Aurora’s City Council unanimously approved a retail tobacco licensure ordinance on first reading Monday night to reduce underage access to tobacco products, including e-cigarettes and vaping cartridges. The ordinance would stiffen fines for businesses that sell to people under 21 and tighten rules on where tobacco retailers can locate in the city.
Feb.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
2Firsts Interview with Glas |Why a California ENDS Company Believes Its Age-gated Flavored Vape Could Be Next in Line for FDA Authorization
2Firsts Interview with Glas |Why a California ENDS Company Believes Its Age-gated Flavored Vape Could Be Next in Line for FDA Authorization
As the FDA advances efforts to streamline its PMTA review process, including support for small businesses, expectations are rising that additional product authorizations may follow. Age-verification technology is emerging as a key consideration in future approvals.In this interview, California-based Glas discusses its G2 platform, integrating smartphone-based identity verification, proximity controls and anti-counterfeit systems, and outlines its positioning under the FDA’s PMTA framework.
Mar.02
Texas college data show rapid shifts in top vaping brands, with Geek Bar/Vape surging by 2025
Texas college data show rapid shifts in top vaping brands, with Geek Bar/Vape surging by 2025
A short communication in Drug and Alcohol Dependence examined changes in the most commonly used nicotine vaping brands among Texas college students from 2023 to 2025. The study analyzed 6,049 students aged 18–25 who reported past-30-day nicotine vaping across three repeated cross-sectional spring surveys. The report found that use of Esco Bar, Elf Bar, JUUL, and Puff Bar declined from 2023 to 2025, while Geek Bar/Vape increased.
Feb.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Mexico to impose an absolute ban on the commercialization, import and sale of vapes from Jan. 16, 2026
Mexico to impose an absolute ban on the commercialization, import and sale of vapes from Jan. 16, 2026
Mexico will enforce an absolute ban on the commercialization, import and sale of vapes and e-cigarettes from January 16, 2026, under a reform published in the Official Journal of the Federation (DOF) amending the General Health Law.
Jan.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Elfbar warns flavour bans could push over 50,000 Scottish vapers back to smoking
Elfbar warns flavour bans could push over 50,000 Scottish vapers back to smoking
Elfbar said restricting vape flavour choices—potentially under the Tobacco and Vapes Bill—could disrupt established quitting behaviours and increase relapse risk among former smokers. An Opinium survey commissioned by the company reported fruit and sweet flavours have risen in popularity among adult vapers quitting smoking in Scotland, with 62% now using them most often to quit, up from 34% in December 2024.
Feb.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Poland to ban “characterising flavours” in heated tobacco sticks from Jan. 18, 2026
Poland to ban “characterising flavours” in heated tobacco sticks from Jan. 18, 2026
Poland will implement an amended health protection law on January 18, 2026, restricting the availability of tobacco inserts used in heated tobacco devices. The new rules prohibit products with a “characterising flavour,” meaning a clearly noticeable taste or smell other than tobacco, derived from additives and detectable before or during use.
Jan.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai