Philippine Customs intercepts illegal shipment of marijuana e-cigarettes

Oct.11.2024
Philippine Customs intercepts illegal shipment of marijuana e-cigarettes
Philippine BOC intercepts shipment of e-cigarettes containing marijuana worth 250,116 pesos from the US at Clark port.

On October 10th, the Bureau of Customs in the Philippines announced on its official website that workers at the Port of Clark intercepted a shipment of e-cigarettes from the United States containing marijuana components. The shipment was valued at 250,116 pesos (approximately $4,400).

Philippine Customs intercepts illegal shipment of marijuana e-cigarettes
BOC seized one hundred e-cigarettes containing cannabis components | Image source: BOC official website


The shipment was declared as "label marker machines," but during X-ray inspection, it was flagged for further examination. Subsequently, customs officials discovered a total of 100 disposable e-cigarettes with different brands of marijuana.

Philippine Customs intercepts illegal shipment of marijuana e-cigarettes
BOC seized a hundred e-cigarettes containing marijuana components. | Image source: BOC official website


After laboratory testing, samples were handed over to the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) for further confirmation that the substances are dangerous drugs as described in RA No. 9165 amendment - marijuana.

Philippine Customs intercepts illegal shipment of marijuana e-cigarettes
BOC seizes one hundred e-cigarettes containing marijuana ingredients | Image source: BOC official website


Authorities have issued an order for the detention and seizure of the batch of goods due to violations of relevant provisions of the Customs Modernization and Tariff Act.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

FDA Commissioner Marty Makary Resigns After Opposing Trump Administration’s Flavored Vape Push
FDA Commissioner Marty Makary Resigns After Opposing Trump Administration’s Flavored Vape Push
FDA Commissioner Marty Makary resigned on May 12 after opposing the Trump administration’s push to authorize fruit-flavored vaping products, according to reporting by The New York Times. Makary reportedly objected over concerns that flavored vapes could attract young people and refused to support broader approvals.
News
May.13
Product | KT&G Expands lil AIBLE 3.0 Sales to Seoul Convenience Stores, Launches Two New AIIM Variants
Product | KT&G Expands lil AIBLE 3.0 Sales to Seoul Convenience Stores, Launches Two New AIIM Variants
According to South Korean media reports, KT&G has expanded sales of its heated tobacco device lil AIBLE 3.0 to convenience stores across Seoul starting May 13. The convenience-store version is offered in the exclusive OUD GRAY color. On the same day, KT&G also launched two new dedicated consumables for the lil AIBLE platform—AIIM REMIX and AIIM ICESPOT—at convenience stores nationwide, each priced at KRW 4,800.
Market
Jun.01
Russian Public Group Seeks Website Restrictions on Remote Vape and Nicotine Sales
Russian Public Group Seeks Website Restrictions on Remote Vape and Nicotine Sales
Russian public movement “Healthy Fatherland,” has proposed blocking access in Russia to online resources that sell vapes and nicotine-containing products remotely.
Apr.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Posts Environmental Assessment for Nicotine Pouches, May Influence Future PMTA Reviews
FDA Posts Environmental Assessment for Nicotine Pouches, May Influence Future PMTA Reviews
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration released a programmatic environmental assessment covering nicotine pouches and other oral nicotine products, concluding that their overall environmental impact is generally minimal.
Regulations
May.22
Disposable Vape Ban Shifts Purchasing Formats as UK Vape Volume Falls 10.3%
Disposable Vape Ban Shifts Purchasing Formats as UK Vape Volume Falls 10.3%
Data from convenience insight agency Talysis shows that the value of tobacco, vapes and smoking alternatives in the independent convenience sector fell by 4.4% in the first quarter of 2026, while volume fell by 7.8%. The vaping subcategory declined by 3.9% in value and 10.3% in volume over the same period. Talysis said the impact of the disposable vape ban continues to pressure turnover and footfall.
May.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai